Math Major Struggles With Apostol's Calculus

  • Thread starter Thread starter bonfire09
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus
Click For Summary
The discussion centers around the challenges faced by a math major who finds Apostol's Single Variable Calculus book difficult despite having completed calculus courses and differential equations with ease. The individual expresses frustration at not being able to solve a significant portion of the problems in Apostol's book, which are noted for their complexity. Suggestions are made to address this issue, including the idea of reading an introductory book on proofs before tackling Apostol's exercises. The importance of understanding proof by induction is emphasized, with recommendations to focus on that topic and to potentially skip certain sections of Apostol's book until foundational proof skills are strengthened. The conversation highlights the necessity of mastering proof techniques for success in real analysis and acknowledges the gap in the individual's exposure to proofs since high school.
bonfire09
Messages
247
Reaction score
0
Ive taken calculus 1-3 and differential equations and didnt think they were hard at all. I like math quite a bit so I decided to open Apostol's Single Variable Calculus Book and decided to attempt the problems. I was only able to do 30% of them and figured that Apostol's calculus is way too hard for me. I'm a math major and I know that I'll need to have done Apostols or spviak's books on Calculus for real analysis, but not being able to do Apostol's calculus is really frustrating me. Is there another way I can go? like maybe read an intro to proofs book and afterwards try doing apostols?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The exercises in Apostol can be quite tricky and difficult. You certainly don't need to be able to solve all of them before taking real analysis.

Can you give us a reason why you can't solve those exercises?? Can you give us an example??
 
here is an example of a problem in the very first section. I've hardly encountered a proof by induction
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    32.7 KB · Views: 349
bonfire09 said:
here is an example of a problem in the very first section. I've hardly encountered a proof by induction

I recommend skipping that section and starting from I 2.1 (Introduction to set theory). You can return to it after you finish the sections on induction (I 4.1 - I 4.10) or skip it entirely.
 
go right now and learn proofs by induction. do not pass go until you do, indeed you will not be able to pass go until you do. this is absolutely fundamental. i thought this was still taught in high school. here is a free set of notes on the topic.
 

Attachments

i haven't had much exposure on proofs in a long time. Last time I had to do proofs were in geometry. I became good at it but after a while I forget about it.
 
TL;DR: Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? Hi, I want to learn ultrafast optics and I am interested in condensed matter physics, ie using ultrafast optics in condensed matter systems. However, before I get onto ultrafast optics I need to improve my electrodynamics knowledge. Should I study Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? My level at the moment is Griffiths. Given my interest in ultrafast optics in condensed matter, I am not sure which book is better suited for me. If...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K