Math/Physics Double Major Benefits for Math/Physics Grad School

  • Thread starter Thread starter Anonymous217
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of pursuing a Math/Physics double major for students considering graduate school in either mathematics or physics. Participants explore the potential benefits and drawbacks of a double major in relation to graduate school applications, course loads, and the perceived value of coursework from each discipline.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that a double major may not provide significant advantages when applying to graduate schools, particularly if one is certain about their field of study.
  • One participant argues that physics courses are not beneficial for math graduate school applications, while the relevance of physics courses for physics graduate school depends on the specific field.
  • Another participant expresses concern that a double major may lead to wasted units that could have been allocated to more relevant math courses.
  • Some participants question the value of a double major in terms of admissions impressiveness, suggesting that it may not be as beneficial as initially thought.
  • There are discussions about the course load differences between double majoring and single majoring, with some participants noting institutional limits on units taken per semester.
  • One participant shares their strategy of taking graduate courses early and emphasizes the importance of research experience alongside coursework.
  • Another participant reflects on the evolving nature of their academic interests and the potential need to adjust their major based on future preferences.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the benefits of a double major, with some believing it offers little advantage for graduate school applications, while others consider it potentially impressive. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the overall value of a double major in this context.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various assumptions regarding course relevance and the impact of research experience on graduate school applications. There are also references to specific institutional policies that may affect course loads and degree requirements.

  • #31
Well, mathematical physics is fine, but I think it's better to either start as physics or math and then move to it. To do research in mathematical physics means you should be able to do research level work in both physics and math. You'd be better off just doing research in whatever subject you master first. Trying to master both will obviously take longer, and your goal is getting to research asap. Having said that, I have no idea what the competition is like for this field.

By mathematical physics I mean rigorous stuff like axiomatic quantum field theory.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
People change fields all the time. You're certainly not bound to what you do research in as an undergraduate for the rest of your life. The idea is that you need to convince people you can do research. That is, people (ie grad school admissions) should see that you're capable of taking something ridiculously over your head and making some sense out of it, and if you can find something new about it and share it with the scientific community, all the better. The main skills are resourcefulness and problem-solving.
 
  • #33
Well yeah, but it should be related to the field you're applying to. I'm not sure how much doing math research will help with your physics grad school application (given probably none of the adcoms will understand what you did - I'm concerned people in het won't understand what I did in my specialized het area).

For best results, you need to set your goals straight as early as possible.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
645
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K