Math: Real or Created By Humans?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter saminator910
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nature
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the philosophical nature of mathematics, questioning whether mathematical concepts are real entities or constructs created by humans. Participants explore the implications of defining mathematical structures, the existence of mathematical truths, and the cultural influences on mathematical development.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the reality of mathematical structures, such as functions, and whether they exist independently of human thought.
  • Another participant references a poem that reflects on the nature of truth and certainty in mathematics, suggesting that mathematical assertions may not need to be justified to be meaningful.
  • Some participants argue that while the questions we ask in mathematics may be culturally influenced, the logical answers derived from those questions are universal and independent of human context.
  • There is a claim that advanced civilizations would develop similar mathematical concepts, such as counting and prime numbers, suggesting a shared mathematical reality.
  • One participant asserts that defining a mathematical structure makes it a "real concept," though this is presented with a light-hearted tone.
  • Another participant quotes a fictional character to emphasize that mental constructs can still be considered real.
  • Some posts indicate that the thread may not align with the intended focus of the math forums, suggesting a distinction between mathematics and its philosophical inquiries.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the nature of mathematics, with no clear consensus reached. Some see mathematical concepts as real, while others emphasize their constructed nature. The philosophical implications of these views remain contested.

Contextual Notes

The discussion touches on philosophical interpretations of mathematics, which may not align with traditional mathematical discourse. There are indications that some participants feel the topic strays from technical mathematical questions.

saminator910
Messages
95
Reaction score
2
is math "real", or created by humans, and other questions about the nature of math.

These questions have disturbed me for the past month. If I define a certain mathematical structure, say a function, is it real? what makes it real, when a class of students ponders a function are they all just imagining this same hypothetical object, or does it exist? Do we humans create math by assigning symbols, or values to objects? Does all of math exist beyond what we humans know, is it all present but undiscovered, or have we been building on axioms to create more math. Have the primes placed in our number system been distributed at the beginning of time, or have we humans created them by defining operations such as division on a number system that we have made up? Can anyone give me any insight on these questions?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


Perhaps not a direct answer to your question, but you might like to ponder what Professor C.R. Wylie was talking about in his sonnett "Paradox":

Paradox
by C. R. Wylie

Not truth, nor certainty. These I forswore
In my novitiate, as young men called
To holy orders must abjure the world.
'If . . . , then . . . ,' this only I assert;
And my successes are but pretty chains
Linking twin doubts, for it is vain to ask
If what I postulate be justified,
Or what I prove possesses the stamp of fact.

Yet bridges stand, and men no longer crawl
In two dimensions. And such triumphs stem
In no small measure from the power this game,
Played with the thrice-attenuated shades
Of things, has over their originals.
How frail the wand, but how profound the spell!
 


The questions we ask, and hence the branches of mathematics that are developed, are to some extent cultural, but the answers we get are not. These follow from logic which is quite independent of any physical facts about the universe in general or us in particular (though some philosophers may disagree).
Any sufficiently advanced civilisation will develop counting and arithmetic, completely equivalent to ours. They may go on to ask questions about numbers, leading them to invent the concept of a prime number, and discover many of the same facts about them.
 


If I define a certain mathematical structure, say a function, is it real?
It is a real concept :smile:
 


TGlad said:
It is a real concept :smile:

“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on Earth should that mean that it is not real?”

Dumbledore always says it best.
 


This thread does not meet the guidelines of the math forums. The math forums are for technical math questions only.
 


This is a question on the philosophy of mathematics, not mathematics.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K