Mathematical Induction 4+11+14+21+....+(5n+(-1)^n

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the formula for the sum of the series 4 + 11 + 14 + 21 + ... + (5n + (-1)^n) using mathematical induction. The user successfully verifies the base case for n=1 and establishes the induction hypothesis. They outline the steps taken to prove the formula for k+1, including algebraic manipulations to incorporate the new term. The proof concludes by demonstrating that the derived expression for P_{n+1} aligns with the expected format, thus completing the induction process. The user seeks assistance with the algebraic steps but ultimately arrives at a valid proof.
Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
Dear all

I am trying to prove by induction the following:

View attachment 8712

I checked it for n=1, it is valid. Then I assume it is correct for some k, and wish to prove it for k+1, got stuck with the algebra. Can you kindly assist ?

Thank you.
 

Attachments

  • induction.PNG
    induction.PNG
    1.5 KB · Views: 121
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would state the induction hypothesis \(P_n\):

$$\sum_{k=1}^{n}\left(5k+(-1)^k\right)=\frac{1}{2}\left(5n(n+1)+(-1)^n-1\right)$$

As the induction step, I would add $$5(n+1)+(-1)^{n+1}$$ to both sides:

$$\sum_{k=1}^{n}\left(5k+(-1)^k\right)+5(n+1)+(-1)^{n+1}=\frac{1}{2}\left(5n(n+1)+(-1)^n-1\right)+5(n+1)+(-1)^{n+1}$$

Incorporate the new term:

$$\sum_{k=1}^{n+1}\left(5k+(-1)^k\right)=\frac{1}{2}\left(5n(n+1)+(-1)^n-1+2\cdot5(n+1)+2\cdot(-1)^{n+1}\right)$$

$$\sum_{k=1}^{n+1}\left(5k+(-1)^k\right)=\frac{1}{2}\left(5(n+1)(n+2)+(-1)^n(1+2(-1))-1\right)$$

$$\sum_{k=1}^{n+1}\left(5k+(-1)^k\right)=\frac{1}{2}\left(5(n+1)((n+1)+1)+(-1)^{n+1}-1\right)$$

We have derived \(P_{n+1}\) from \(P_n\) thereby completing the proof by induction.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top