Mathematical objects, structures and spaces

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter autodidude
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mathematical Structures
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of mathematical objects, structures, and spaces, exploring how they can be visualized and understood. Participants consider various representations and definitions, including sets and geometric shapes, while discussing the complexity of these concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that mathematical objects can be visualized as complex shapes formed by equations, similar to how basic equations create simpler shapes like circles.
  • One participant defines mathematical objects as sets, providing the example of a sphere as the set of points where the sum of the squares equals one, indicating that this represents an infinite set of points forming a surface.
  • The Mandelbrot set is mentioned as another example of a mathematical object defined as a set of 2D points or complex numbers.
  • Another participant notes that some mathematical concepts, like the Möbius strip, do not require specific shapes or lengths, emphasizing the abstract nature of certain objects.
  • There is a discussion about the use of different representations, such as Venn diagrams, to visualize complex mathematical ideas, particularly in the context of probability.
  • One participant asserts that everything in mathematics can be considered an "object," "structure," or "shape."
  • Another participant explains that "structures" and "spaces" refer to collections of objects governed by rules that dictate their behavior and interactions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying interpretations of mathematical objects and their visualizations, indicating that multiple competing views remain. The discussion does not reach a consensus on a singular definition or understanding.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity and abstraction involved in defining and visualizing mathematical objects, suggesting that different contexts may require different representations and interpretations.

autodidude
Messages
332
Reaction score
0
What are they, how are they visualized? Is it like how basic equations when plotted form a shape (e.g. circle) but much more complex?

When I think of the those words, I think of some sort of weird/cool looking shape.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can mean a lot of things, but commonly mathematical objects are defined as sets. For example a sphere can be defined as the set of points x,y,z such that the sum of the squares equals 1.
That is shorthand for {(1,0,0), (0.999, 0.001, 0.001), (0.998, 0.003, 0.003), ...}
In fact it is an infinite set of points... which in this case forms a surface.

The mandelbrot set is similarly just a set of 2d points, or rather, complex numbers.

Sometimes you don't even specify the set of points, they are just concepts. For example the mobius strip is a ribbon where the end is attached to the start but rotated 180 degrees. The exact shape or length of the strip is not important.

Did that help?
 
autodidude said:
What are they, how are they visualized? Is it like how basic equations when plotted form a shape (e.g. circle) but much more complex?

When I think of the those words, I think of some sort of weird/cool looking shape.

Hey autodidude.

It depends. You could be describing an object like a surface, volume or other higher dimensional object and in one way, you could graph the actual surface/whatever itself (and also projections if it is a higher dimensional object), or you could use a 2D venn diagram that is transformed in a way that makes more graphical intuitive sense.

Usually when you think about probability, it can make sense to use a Venn diagram, or maybe to use several Venn diagrams in some scenarios.

What you will find is that depending on what you are talking about, new kinds of representations whether they are algebraic or geometric creep in. You'll see this anywhere, whether it is algebra (graduate algebra not high school algebra), or something else.

But yeah sometimes it can be useful to reduce objects down to points and then represent those points in venn diagrams. There is a lot of transformation and work going on behind the scenes in this regard, but it can help make sense of something that is otherwise more complex.
 
Everything in mathematics is an "object", "structure", or "shape"!
 
@TGlad: yeah, that makes some sense to me

thanks guys
 
When mathematicians talk about "structures" and "spaces", they're generally talking about collections of objects with rules governing how they behave and interact.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
868
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
41
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
637