Maths in 1M Years: Can We Improve?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mr-tom
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Years
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the future of mathematics in one million years, considering potential improvements in mathematical language, notation, and efficiency. Participants speculate on how human evolution, technology, and societal changes might influence mathematical concepts and practices over such a long time frame.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that new notations could simplify mathematics, potentially allowing for complex concepts to be taught at earlier educational stages.
  • Others argue that the pace of mathematical progress is accelerating, suggesting that future developments could be beyond current comprehension.
  • A viewpoint is expressed that the evolution of human cognition, possibly enhanced by technology, could lead to significant advancements in mathematical capabilities.
  • Some participants discuss the limitations of current numeral systems, such as Roman numerals, and suggest alternative bases like six or twelve for greater efficiency in calculations.
  • There is a suggestion that future mathematics may involve more dimensions and advanced probability theories, potentially improving predictions in various fields.
  • One participant expresses a preference for the current state of mathematics, highlighting the complexity involved in finding large prime numbers and the economic implications of this work.
  • Another participant humorously challenges a previous claim about the future of mathematics, indicating a disagreement on the nature of mathematical evolution.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a variety of views on the future of mathematics, with no clear consensus on specific predictions or improvements. Disagreements exist regarding the effectiveness of current numeral systems and the nature of future mathematical developments.

Contextual Notes

Some claims rely on assumptions about human evolution and technological advancements that are not universally accepted. The discussion includes speculative ideas that may not be grounded in current mathematical practices or theories.

mr-tom
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Assuming we're not extinct, what will maths be like in one million years. Can the language be improved in any way? Would we be more efficient with fewer/more digits than 9.

Imagine if we we're using roman numerals how crap everything would be...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think they'll use completely new notations for everything which would make everything so much more easier and hence teach the equivalent of abstract algebra in primary school.
 
We probably haven't the slightest idea. Look back ten thousand years ago, then one thousand, then one hundred, it seems that mathematical speed of progress accelerates ever more. So, one million years, we can even assume that our body shape will have evolved, not even to mention knowledge...
 
At that point in time, we have killed ourself long ago.
 
In the future everything will commute.
 
mr-tom said:
Assuming we're not extinct, what will maths be like in one million years. Can the language be improved in any way? Would we be more efficient with fewer/more digits than 9.

Imagine if we we're using roman numerals how crap everything would be...

What's wrong with Roman numerals?

It's a pretty lousy way to write numbers, but a very efficient way to think about numbers. If there's a problem with the system, it's that it is taught in elementary school by liberal arts majors that lack any understanding of the system other than how to write it.

It's no coincidence that it pops up in so many ways, such as money ($1, 5$, and $10 bills).

Also, we use 10 digits in a base 10 system, including 0.

Elementary schools could probably do a better job teaching kids how to count on their fingers and toes, too. (Couldn't resist)
 
I think (actually, I hope) it will follow the evoluton of our brains - which will (probably) be routinely upgraded with various microelectronic devices.

Maybe one day we will have the capacity to perform FFTs, triple integrals and differentials etc. mentaly just like today we add or multiply numbers when we go shopping.

That would be a basis for a much more complex multi-dimensional math, but written in apparently simple way.
Say, A + B = C (mentally), where A, B and C are things we resolve today (in a painstaking manner) with tools like Matlab, Mathematica and similar, without even really understanding their intimate meaning. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
The same as it is now but with more dimensions probably. Mathematicians like dimensions. Probably have some advanced probability maths that allow us to predict economics or sports with much greater precision. And physics will finally explain using an advanced mathematical model well beyond our ability to comprehend (God knows how!) How the humble bumble bee can fly.
 
BobG said:
What's wrong with Roman numerals?
Base six (or twelve) might be more efficient, since division (multplication) by 2 and 3 become trivial. By extension, base 30 also includes 5, and base 210 includes 7... and base [tex]\Pi p_n[/tex] with n up to N will include the N fisrt prime numbers. This (modular) way of thinking about integers numbers is very powerful, leads to the continuous fraction [tex]n=a+\frac{1}{b+\frac{1}{c+\frac{1}{\cdots}}}[/tex] form which is sometimes claimed to describe how Ramanujan conceived numbers. That starting point would constitute a significant leap leading to a genuinely different construction of mathematics altogether.

Disclaimer : writing those lines, I was just listening to myself and have no intention to justify those claims unless under the theat of face fish-slapping [/size]
 
  • #10
jimmysnyder said:
In the future everything will commute.
:smile:
I was exactly thinking the opposite :rolleyes:
 
  • #11
Fortunately I love the current way we do math in this time.

Specifically, I love how there is not yet an equation that allows computers to find crazy high prime numbers very fast. Mainly, the current equations require lots of computation rather than large numbers coming from few computations.

Case in point. Working on those numbers is probably the best way to get rich in this day in age because companies will pay you crazy amounts of money to 1) keep quiet and 2) make encoding for them.
 
  • #12
Moridin said:
At that point in time, we have killed ourself long ago.

Can you read? He said assuming we don't kill ourselves. Now, for fun, look up "End of Ze World" on Youtube.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K