Matrices and Invertible Linear Transformations

Click For Summary
The linear transformation T is represented by the matrix [0 2; 1 -3], which is confirmed to be invertible since its determinant is -2, a non-zero value. An invertible linear transformation requires that the function is both "one-to-one" and "onto." The discussion demonstrates that T is "one-to-one" by showing that if f([x,y]) = f([x',y']), then [x,y] must equal [x',y']. Additionally, it is shown to be "onto" by establishing that for any vector [u,v] in R2, there exist corresponding [x,y] values that satisfy the transformation. Therefore, the linear transformation T is indeed invertible.
war485
Messages
90
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



How do I know if this linear transformation is invertible or not?

T: [ x ] ---> [ 2y ]
[ y ] [ x-3y ]

(I also uploaded a small .bmp file to represent this if this looks too ugly)

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, I thought maybe it could be represented by a transformation matrix T
[ 0 2 ]
[ 1 -3 ]

So then I just took the inverse of T, which I got as
[ 1.5 1 ]
[ 0.5 0 ]

So does that mean that in the question, it is invertible? Because if it is, I'm getting the impression that these R2 to R2 linear transformations are invertible. Would this impression be correct?
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, a linear transformation is invertible if and only if a matrix representing it in some basis is invertible. And that is the true if and only if the determinant is non-zero so just observing that 0(-3)- (1)(2)= -2 is sufficient.


Of course, from the basic definition a function is invertible if and only if it is "one-to-one" and "onto" so you could do this:
Suppose f[(x,y])= f(]x',y']). Then [2y, x- 3y]= [2y', x'- 3y'] so 2y= 2y' and y= y'. Then x- 3y= x' -3y'= x'- 3y so x= x'. The function is "one-to-one".

If [u, v] is any vector in R2, if f([x,y])= [u, v], then 2y= u and x- 3y= v. From the first equation, y= u/2 so x- 3y= x- (3/2)u= v and x= (3/2)u+ v. Yes, there exist [x, y] such that f([x,y])= [u, v] for any [u,v] so f is "onto".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K