Matrices: Rows and Columns Meaning

  • Thread starter Thread starter henry3369
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Columns Matrices
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the concept of column space in relation to matrices and systems of linear equations. The column space of a matrix A consists of all linear combinations of its columns, which can be represented as vectors. To determine if a vector b is in the column space of A, one can row reduce the augmented matrix [A | b]. This process is consistent with solving systems of linear equations, where the columns of the coefficient matrix represent the coefficients of the variables. Ultimately, the goal is to ascertain whether the system can be solved, confirming that b lies within the column space of A.
henry3369
Messages
194
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to learn column space currently and I'm confused about the meaning of rows and columns.
So I'm given this definition for column space:
"The column space of matrix A is the set Col A of all linear combinations of the columns of A"

Given the matrix A:
[ 1 -3 -4 ]
[ -4 6 -2 ]
[ -3 7 6 ]

b=
[ 3 ]
[ 3 ]
[ -4 ]

Determine if b is in the column space of A.

My books solves by row reducing [ A b ].

Has this always been what I was solving for whenever I row reduced an augmented matrix to obtain x for Ax = b?
For example, when I'm given a system of linear equation such as:
2x1 + 3x2 = 5
1x1 + 2x2 = 3
and I have to solve for x.

Do the columns of the coefficient matrix of this system of linear equation, have the same meaning as the matrix above, vectors?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not certain what your question is but I think the answer is:

Yes, the matrix equation corresponding to the system of equations
ax+ by+ cz= p
dx+ ey+ fz= q
gx+ hy+ iz= r

is
\begin{bmatrix}a & b & c \\ d & e & f \\ g & h & i\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}x \\ y \\ z \end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}p \\ q \\ r\end{bmatrix}
so that, yes, the columns are the coefficients of the three unknown numbers.

Here, to determine if < 3, 3, -4> is in the "column space" of the given matrix you have to determine if it is in the space spanned by <1, -4, -3>, <-3, 6, 7>, and < -4, 2, 6>, the columns written as individual vectors.
That is the same as asking if there exist numbers, x, y, and z, such that a< 1, -4, -3>+ b<-3, 6, 7>+ c<-4, 2, 6>= <3, 3, -4> which is, in turn, the same as asking if there exist x, y, and z such that a- 3b- 4c= 3, -4a+ 6b+ 3c= 3, and -3a+ 7b- 4c= -4, a system of equations which is the same as the matrix equation
\begin{bmatrix}1 &amp; -3 &amp; -4 \\ -4 &amp; 6 &amp; 3 \\ -3 &amp; 7 &amp; -4\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}x \\ y \\ x \\ y \end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}3 \\ 3 \\ -4 \end{bmatrix}

And, yes, you can attempt to solve that system of equation/matrix equation (the whole point is whether or not it can solved) by row reducing the "augmented matrix"
\begin{bmatrix}1 &amp; -3 &amp; -4 &amp; 3 \\ -4 &amp; 6 &amp; 3 &amp; 3 \\ -3 &amp; 7 &amp; -4 &amp; - 4\end{bmatrix}
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K