Matrix determinant operator commutative?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the properties of determinants in relation to matrix multiplication. It confirms that the determinant of the product of matrices is equal to the product of their determinants, regardless of the order of multiplication. While matrix multiplication is generally non-commutative, the determinant operator appears to maintain a form of commutativity, as the order of factors does not affect the result. A clarification is made that the condition for the determinant property should specify that the matrices involved must be square, rather than nonsingular. This highlights the unique behavior of determinants in the context of matrix multiplication.
el_llavero
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
I've been going through properties of determinants of matrices and found the following:

Assuming products are defined and the matrices involved are nonsingular of the same order

The determinant of the product of any number of matrices is equal to the determinant of each matrix; where the order of factors does not matter

det(AB)=det(A)det(B)
det(AB)=det(B)det(A)
det(BA)=det(A)det(B)
det(BA)=det(B)det(A)

det(ABC)=det(C)det(A)det(B)

det(ACB)=det(A)det(B)det(C)

Is this correct? And is there a way to describe this property regarding commutatively? I know in general matrix multiplication is not commutative unless the matrices involved are diagonal and of the same dimension. However the determinant operator seems to not preserve the non commutative property of matrix multiplication, on either side of the equality. What I’m looking for here is a formal way of describing this property that encompasses the fact that order of factors does not matter and if commutativity should be used in any part of this description. Is matrix multiplication commutative?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Probably (multiplicative) distributivity for the determinant together with commutativity of it's target space are the terms you are looking for.
 
Thanks, that makes sense. Can you explain a bit more why is matrix multiplication commutative?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Something isn't completely accurate in the second sentence of the original post

"Assuming products are defined and the matrices involved are nonsingular of the same order"

since it doesn't matter if the matrices are nonsingular for this property to hold a more accurate statement would be

"Assuming products are defined and the matrices involved are square matrices"
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
9K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
15K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K