Matter & Antimatter: Attraction & Annihilation Evidence?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Adhruth Ganesh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Antimatter Matter
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the interactions between matter and antimatter, specifically their attraction and annihilation properties. When an electron and a positron are placed together, they attract due to opposite charges and eventually annihilate, forming positronium. Conversely, a positron and an anti-proton repel each other due to like charges, preventing annihilation. Strong evidence for the existence of antimatter includes its production in laboratories and its application in medical imaging, such as positron emission tomography (PET).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of particle physics concepts, including electrons and positrons.
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic forces and charge interactions.
  • Knowledge of particle collision experiments and their significance in modern physics.
  • Awareness of applications of antimatter in medical technology, specifically PET scans.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and applications of positronium in quantum physics.
  • Explore the role of antimatter in particle accelerators and collider experiments.
  • Study the principles of magnetic confinement for antimatter storage.
  • Investigate the implications of antimatter in cosmology and the universe's matter-antimatter asymmetry.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in particle physics, medical professionals utilizing PET technology, and anyone interested in the fundamental properties of matter and antimatter.

Adhruth Ganesh
Messages
14
Reaction score
3
If matter and antimatter are placed next to each other, will they attract each other and annihilate ? Do we have strong evidence regarding the existence of anti-matter ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Antimatter has been created in labs. It may be the most expensive material man possesses.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter#Natural_production

If an anti-matter particle has a charge, it will attract is matter counterpart - because opposite charges attract. Otherwise, there will be gravitation attraction - but that is often very slight.

On Earth, antimatter needs to be kept in magnetic bottles in a vacuum - otherwise it will contact air or the floor of the container.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ohwilleke and Adhruth Ganesh
Adhruth Ganesh said:
If matter and antimatter are placed next to each other, will they attract each other and annihilate ?
It depends. If you place an electron and a positron next to each other, they have opposite charges so they will attract, and eventually they will annihilate each other. Look up positronium.

If you put a positron next to an anti-proton EDIT: proton, they will repel since they have a like charge, and they will never by able to annihilate each other.

Adhruth Ganesh said:
Do we have strong evidence regarding the existence of anti-matter ?
Yes. For instance, anti-matter is created all the time is hospitals: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positron_emission_tomography
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ohwilleke and Adhruth Ganesh
.Scott said:
Antimatter has been created in labs. It may be the most expensive material man possesses.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter#Natural_production

If an anti-matter particle has a charge, it will attract is matter counterpart - because opposite charges attract. Otherwise, there will be gravitation attraction - but that is often very slight.

On Earth, antimatter needs to be kept in magnetic bottles in a vacuum - otherwise it will contact air or the floor of the container.

Fine. Thank you for your answer !
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
DrClaude said:
It depends. If you place an electron and a positron next to each other, they have opposite charges so they will attract, and eventually they will annihilate each other. Look up positronium.

If you put a positron next to an anti-proton, they will repel since they have a like charge, and they will never by able to annihilate each other.Yes. For instance, anti-matter is created all the time is hospitals: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positron_emission_tomography
Thank you so much !
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Not only is antimatter created and used every single day in many different places around the world, modern particle physics is constructed using a theory that contains antimatter. We crash particles together in colliders and watch what comes out of the collisions, and these events always closely obey our predictions using this theory. If antimatter didn't exist, then our theory is suspiciously accurate for being so wrong. Not only that, but we'd have to come up with an explanation for the particle tracks we see in cloud chambers and other related detectors that don't match any of our 'regular' matter particles. If they aren't antimatter particles, then why are they acting exactly as if they have opposite charge and other properties compared to normal matter particles?

Antimatter is the simplest explanation to all of these issues, and it follows directly from both theory and experience in the early 20th century when we had to explain other effects by proposing the existence of new types of particles. Antimatter is the simplest, least complex explanation that still accurately explains an enormous number of observations and experiments. You will not find another explanation that does so well.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ohwilleke and Adhruth Ganesh
Drakkith said:
Not only is antimatter created and used every single day in many different places around the world, modern particle physics is constructed using a theory that contains antimatter. We crash particles together in colliders and watch what comes out of the collisions, and these events always closely obey our predictions using this theory. If antimatter didn't exist, then our theory is suspiciously accurate for being so wrong. Not only that, but we'd have to come up with an explanation for the particle tracks we see in cloud chambers and other related detectors that don't match any of our 'regular' matter particles. If they aren't antimatter particles, then why are they acting exactly as if they have opposite charge and other properties compared to normal matter particles?

Antimatter is the simplest explanation to all of these issues, and it follows directly from both theory and experience in the early 20th century when we had to explain other effects by proposing the existence of new types of particles. Antimatter is the simplest, least complex explanation that still accurately explains an enormous number of observations and experiments. You will not find another explanation that does so well.

Thanks a lot !
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
13K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K