I Matter Anti-Matter Annihilation

Click For Summary
Matter-antimatter annihilation results in energy carried by particles from the Standard Model, not "pure energy." The energy produced in these collisions is complex, with various particles like gamma rays and pions generated, each with different properties affecting their usability in applications like propulsion. Dark energy and dark matter are not involved in matter-antimatter annihilation, as clarified in the discussion. The concept of "pure energy" is misleading, as energy always exists in specific forms. The conversation emphasizes the need for accurate terminology and understanding in discussions about particle physics.
rocketwaveuk
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
The pure energy coming from a collision and how is it measured or is it just "A Formula" and is any of that energy Dark Energy or even Dark Matter, the reason for the question is because the Dark Energy/Matter vs normal Energy/Matter seems to align with what is seen now after the Big Bang Annihilation. Does anyone know of a research into this field.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rocketwaveuk said:
The pure energy coming from a collision and how is it measured or is it just "A Formula" and is any of that energy Dark Energy or even Dark Matter, the reason for the question is because the Dark Energy/Matter vs normal Energy/Matter seems to align with what is seen now after the Big Bang Annihilation. Does anyone know of a research into this field.
The result of matter-antimatter collisions is not "pure energy" but rather energy carried by particles of the Standard Model. From a discussion of matter-antimatter annihilation for rocket propulsion
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter):
"Not all of that energy can be utilized by any realistic propulsion technology because of the nature of the annihilation products. While electron–positron reactions result in gamma ray photons, these are difficult to direct and use for thrust. In reactions between protons and antiprotons, their energy is converted largely into relativistic neutral and charged pions. The neutral pions decay almost immediately (with a lifetime of 85 attoseconds) into high-energy photons, but the charged pions decay more slowly (with a lifetime of 26 nanoseconds) and can be deflected magnetically to produce thrust.
Charged pions ultimately decay into a combination of neutrinos (carrying about 22% of the energy of the charged pions) and unstable charged muons (carrying about 78% of the charged pion energy), with the muons then decaying into a combination of electrons, positrons and neutrinos (cf. muon decay; the neutrinos from this decay carry about 2/3 of the energy of the muons, meaning that from the original charged pions, the total fraction of their energy converted to neutrinos by one route or another would be about 0.22 + (2/3)⋅0.78 = 0.74).
"

No mention of "dark energy" or "dark matter".
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke, mfb, PeroK and 1 other person
Matter antimatter annihilation has nothing to do with either dark energy or dark matter. What led you to believe it did?
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke, PeroK and berkeman
sorry if i confused you , i asked some questions , i did not state any belief, and also gave the reason at the end for the question.
renormalize was kind enough to answer with a explanation i can understand.
 
Also:

rocketwaveuk said:
pure energy

there is no such thing, just like there is no "pure velocity", etc.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke, berkeman and Vanadium 50
Thread 'Some confusion with the Binding Energy graph of atoms'
My question is about the following graph: I keep on reading that fusing atoms up until Fe-56 doesn’t cost energy and only releases binding energy. However, I understood that fusing atoms also require energy to overcome the positive charges of the protons. Where does that energy go after fusion? Does it go into the mass of the newly fused atom, escape as heat or is the released binding energy shown in the graph actually the net energy after subtracting the required fusion energy? I...