MHB Max of $st+tu+uv$ given $s,t,u,v$ sum 63

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maximum
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
If $s,\,t,\,u,\,v$ are positive integers with sum $63$, find the maximum value of $st+tu+uv$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
My solution:

We are given the objective function:

$$f(s,t,u,v)=st+tu+uv$$

Subject to the constraint:

$$g(s,t,u,v)=s+t+u+v-63=0$$

Applying Lagrange multipliers, we obtain the system:

$$t=\lambda$$

$$s+u=\lambda$$

$$t+v=\lambda$$

$$u=\lambda$$

From this, we readily see $t=u$ and then $s=v=0$. Using the constraint, we then find:

$$2t=63\implies t=u=\frac{63}{2}=31.5$$

Since we require the variables to be positive integers, let $(s,t,u,v)=(1,30,31,1)$ (or equivalently $(s,t,u,v)=(1,31,30,1)$) as these permutations are the closest to the real number maximum, then we find:

$$f_{\max}=f(1,30,31,1)=1\cdot30+30\cdot31+31\cdot1=30+930+31=991$$
 
MarkFL said:
My solution:

We are given the objective function:

$$f(s,t,u,v)=st+tu+uv$$

Subject to the constraint:

$$g(s,t,u,v)=s+t+u+v-63=0$$

Applying Lagrange multipliers, we obtain the system:

$$t=\lambda$$

$$s+u=\lambda$$

$$t+v=\lambda$$

$$u=\lambda$$

From this, we readily see $t=u$ and then $s=v=0$. Using the constraint, we then find:

$$2t=63\implies t=u=\frac{63}{2}=31.5$$

Since we require the variables to be positive integers, let $(s,t,u,v)=(1,30,31,1)$ (or equivalently $(s,t,u,v)=(1,31,30,1)$) as these permutations are the closest to the real number maximum, then we find:

$$f_{\max}=f(1,30,31,1)=1\cdot30+30\cdot31+31\cdot1=30+930+31=991$$

Awesome, MarkFL! :D
 
anemone said:
If $s,\,t,\,u,\,v$ are positive integers with sum $63$, find the maximum value of $st+tu+uv$.

$st+tu+uv = (s+u)(v+t) -vs$
as in the 1st term v and s do not lie in isolation we can maximize $(s+u)(v+t)$ and then minimize $vs$ independently . clearly $(s+u)(v+t)$ is maximum when they are as close as possible
so $s+ u = 32$ and $v+t = 31$ or $s+u = 31$ and $v+ t = 32$
and vs is minimum when $v=s = 1$
so we have $s= 1, u= 31, v= 1, t= 30$ or $s = 1, u = 30, t= 31, v= 1$ and in both cases $st+tu+uv = 31 * 32-1 = 991$ maximum
 
kaliprasad said:
$st+tu+uv = (s+u)(v+t) -vs$
as in the 1st term v and s do not lie in isolation we can maximize $(s+u)(v+t)$ and then minimize $vs$ independently . clearly $(s+u)(v+t)$ is maximum when they are as close as possible
so $s+ u = 32$ and $v+t = 31$ or $s+u = 31$ and $v+ t = 32$
and vs is minimum when $v=s = 1$
so we have $s= 1, u= 31, v= 1, t= 30$ or $s = 1, u = 30, t= 31, v= 1$ and in both cases $st+tu+uv = 31 * 32-1 = 991$ maximum

This was posted at http://mathhelpboards.com/challenge-questions-puzzles-28/find-maximum-sum-11061.html
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top