MHB Max of $st+tu+uv$ given $s,t,u,v$ sum 63

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maximum
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
If $s,\,t,\,u,\,v$ are positive integers with sum $63$, find the maximum value of $st+tu+uv$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
My solution:

We are given the objective function:

$$f(s,t,u,v)=st+tu+uv$$

Subject to the constraint:

$$g(s,t,u,v)=s+t+u+v-63=0$$

Applying Lagrange multipliers, we obtain the system:

$$t=\lambda$$

$$s+u=\lambda$$

$$t+v=\lambda$$

$$u=\lambda$$

From this, we readily see $t=u$ and then $s=v=0$. Using the constraint, we then find:

$$2t=63\implies t=u=\frac{63}{2}=31.5$$

Since we require the variables to be positive integers, let $(s,t,u,v)=(1,30,31,1)$ (or equivalently $(s,t,u,v)=(1,31,30,1)$) as these permutations are the closest to the real number maximum, then we find:

$$f_{\max}=f(1,30,31,1)=1\cdot30+30\cdot31+31\cdot1=30+930+31=991$$
 
MarkFL said:
My solution:

We are given the objective function:

$$f(s,t,u,v)=st+tu+uv$$

Subject to the constraint:

$$g(s,t,u,v)=s+t+u+v-63=0$$

Applying Lagrange multipliers, we obtain the system:

$$t=\lambda$$

$$s+u=\lambda$$

$$t+v=\lambda$$

$$u=\lambda$$

From this, we readily see $t=u$ and then $s=v=0$. Using the constraint, we then find:

$$2t=63\implies t=u=\frac{63}{2}=31.5$$

Since we require the variables to be positive integers, let $(s,t,u,v)=(1,30,31,1)$ (or equivalently $(s,t,u,v)=(1,31,30,1)$) as these permutations are the closest to the real number maximum, then we find:

$$f_{\max}=f(1,30,31,1)=1\cdot30+30\cdot31+31\cdot1=30+930+31=991$$

Awesome, MarkFL! :D
 
anemone said:
If $s,\,t,\,u,\,v$ are positive integers with sum $63$, find the maximum value of $st+tu+uv$.

$st+tu+uv = (s+u)(v+t) -vs$
as in the 1st term v and s do not lie in isolation we can maximize $(s+u)(v+t)$ and then minimize $vs$ independently . clearly $(s+u)(v+t)$ is maximum when they are as close as possible
so $s+ u = 32$ and $v+t = 31$ or $s+u = 31$ and $v+ t = 32$
and vs is minimum when $v=s = 1$
so we have $s= 1, u= 31, v= 1, t= 30$ or $s = 1, u = 30, t= 31, v= 1$ and in both cases $st+tu+uv = 31 * 32-1 = 991$ maximum
 
kaliprasad said:
$st+tu+uv = (s+u)(v+t) -vs$
as in the 1st term v and s do not lie in isolation we can maximize $(s+u)(v+t)$ and then minimize $vs$ independently . clearly $(s+u)(v+t)$ is maximum when they are as close as possible
so $s+ u = 32$ and $v+t = 31$ or $s+u = 31$ and $v+ t = 32$
and vs is minimum when $v=s = 1$
so we have $s= 1, u= 31, v= 1, t= 30$ or $s = 1, u = 30, t= 31, v= 1$ and in both cases $st+tu+uv = 31 * 32-1 = 991$ maximum

This was posted at http://mathhelpboards.com/challenge-questions-puzzles-28/find-maximum-sum-11061.html
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top