MHB Maximal Elements in a Bounded Set

  • Thread starter Thread starter ertagon2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sets
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the concept of maximal elements in a bounded set, specifically addressing questions related to a set defined by the expression {1 - 1/(n+1) | n ∈ ℕ}. It highlights that while the set S = {0, 1/2, 2/3, 3/4, ...} is bounded above by 1, 1 itself is not an element of S, making it the least upper bound. Consequently, no element in S can be considered maximal, as each element has a greater successor within the set. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding bounded sets and the definitions of upper bounds and maximal elements. Overall, the discussion clarifies misconceptions about maximal elements in relation to bounded sets.
ertagon2
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Could someone please check these questions? Please correct them if necessary, with an explanation if you could.
View attachment 7937
 

Attachments

  • maths52p1.png
    maths52p1.png
    18.3 KB · Views: 124
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi ertagon2,

Everything looks OK, except 5b. Think about the set $\displaystyle\left\{1-\frac{1}{n+1}\:\bigg|\: n\in\mathbb{N}\right\}$.
 
I agree with everything except 5.2. Consider an open interval.
 
castor28 said:
Hi ertagon2,

Everything looks OK, except 5b. Think about the set $\displaystyle\left\{1-\frac{1}{n+1}\:\bigg|\: n\in\mathbb{N}\right\}$.

I don't think I understand. Can you elaborate?
 
ertagon2 said:
I don't think I understand. Can you elaborate?
Hi ertagon2,

This is the set $\displaystyle S=\left\{0,\frac12,\frac23,\frac34,\ldots\right\}\subset\mathbb{Q}$. This set is bounded above (by $1$). In fact, $1$ is the least upper bound of $S$, but it is not an element of $S$.

No element of $S$ can be maximal, because, for each element $\left(1 - \dfrac{1}{n+1}\right)\in S$, $\left(1 - \dfrac{1}{n+2}\right)$ is greater and also an element of $S$.
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top