Maximum Drawdown (Binomial tree)

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kk007
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maximum Tree
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 4K views
kk007
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Imagine there is a game and a gambler has a prob. of P1 in winning one unit of capital in a trial and 1 - P1 in lossing one unit.

He wants to know the prob. of HAVING EVER lost more than or equal to a threshold no. of units (drawdown threshold) at or before the end of a number of trials.

For example, if his prob. winning 1 unit is 0.6 and lossing 1 unit is 0.4, what is his probability of having ever lost more than or equal to 10 units at or before the end of 30 trials?

To illustrate the "having ever" concept a bit more, imagine the gambler has 10 golden coins, at any time-step, he uses 1 golden coin for gambling, if he has lost all of them before the end of the 30 trials, his attempt is over.

Thanks in advance!
 
on Phys.org
Problem solved!

kk007 said:
Imagine there is a game and a gambler has a prob. of P1 in winning one unit of capital in a trial and 1 - P1 in lossing one unit.

He wants to know the prob. of HAVING EVER lost more than or equal to a threshold no. of units (drawdown threshold) at or before the end of a number of trials.

For example, if his prob. winning 1 unit is 0.6 and lossing 1 unit is 0.4, what is his probability of having ever lost more than or equal to 10 units at or before the end of 30 trials?

To illustrate the "having ever" concept a bit more, imagine the gambler has 10 golden coins, at any time-step, he uses 1 golden coin for gambling, if he has lost all of them before the end of the 30 trials, his attempt is over.

Thanks in advance!
 
Awesome. Did you solve it using a generating function or with the Inclusion/Exclusion principle? That seems like a hard problem.
 
I just now learned of the technique for counting random walk paths called the reflection principle, or method of images. It simplifies things a lot. Perhaps that's how you solved it so quickly.