MCNP - Tallies definition with "<"

  • Thread starter Thread starter 19matthew89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition Mcnp
AI Thread Summary
The "<" symbol in MCNP tallies indicates a logical operator used to define regions within repeated structures, specifically in lattice configurations. This operator helps specify elements in these structures, often accompanied by coordinates like [x y z]. The manual's reference to this usage can be found in multiple listings, including Listings 5.13, 5.51, and 6.2. However, the explanation in the manual, particularly in section 5.9.1.5, is noted to be unclear. Understanding this notation is crucial for effectively utilizing tallies in MCNP simulations.
19matthew89
Messages
46
Reaction score
12
TL;DR Summary
Examples of tallies definition with logical operator "<" but I don't know what it means.
Hi everyone,

In MCNP manual there are often examples of Listing containing examples of tallies which have, in the definition of the cells/surfaces of the tally itself, the "<" symbol. I could not find in the document any reference to the use of logical expression in the definition of tallies (assuming "<" is actually used as a logical operator).

Could you please tell me what it means?

Referring to the last version of the manual (MCNP® Code Version 6.3.0 Theory & User Manual) the first example of use in a Listing is for Listing 5.13 but it appears in several other listing (e.g. Listing 5.51 or Listing 6.2).

Thanks a lot in advance.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I actually stared at the example for about 10 mins completely clueless, before realising I'd used these myself. That is a such an unhelpful fragment. < means within and [x y z], which you'd commonly see with it, means part of a lattice. They are for specifying elements in repeated structures built with universe/fill.

See "5.9.1.5 Repeated Structures Tallies" for not a great explanation.
 
  • Like
Likes Grelbr42 and 19matthew89
Thanks a lot!
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top