MCNP6 Error: "Geometry error: no cell found"

Click For Summary
The user is experiencing a "Geometry error: no cell found" issue in MCNP6. The solution involves adjusting the bounding sphere to ensure that no objects extend beyond it, as anything outside is considered void. By using the command "mcnp ip inp=filename" and checking specific coordinates, it was discovered that some objects were protruding. Increasing the size of the bounding sphere resolved the issue. The user confirmed that the problem has been solved.
ameermukhtar
Messages
17
Reaction score
1
respected all
i am using MCNP6 and i am facing this problem from days and i can not found solution if anyone help me than i am ever grateful to you
files are attached
Thanks
 

Attachments

  • 屏幕截图 2024-12-27 025957.png
    屏幕截图 2024-12-27 025957.png
    32.6 KB · Views: 46
  • neutron16.txt
    neutron16.txt
    7.1 KB · Views: 43
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hello @ameermukhtar,

Welcome to PhysicsForums. Your bounding sphere defines the experiment area, and anything outside it is part of the void. That works so long as no objects poke through. If you run "mcnp ip inp=filename", the default view seems fine. But click on the input box and type "pz 149", to check close to corners of 9 and 10, you can see the corners of 9 (rpp) sticking through it. Just try making the sphere bigger and see if that fixes the problem.
 
can you correct it brother
 
Alex A said:
Hello @ameermukhtar,

Welcome to PhysicsForums. Your bounding sphere defines the experiment area, and anything outside it is part of the void. That works so long as no objects poke through. If you run "mcnp ip inp=filename", the default view seems fine. But click on the input box and type "pz 149", to check close to corners of 9 and 10, you can see the corners of 9 (rpp) sticking through it. Just try making the sphere bigger and see if that fixes the problem.
thank you dear the problem has been solved
 

Thread 'The Nuclear Power Thread'

I'd like to start a discussion/debate of nuclear power for the purpose of informing people about it. I am participating in a thread in another forum http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=9370 where we are discussing an article about Germany planning to phase out nuclear power. I am STRONGLY against this. It is bad for scientific, economic, political, and environmental reasons. In the course of discussions of the nuclear power issue, it seems to me that the arguements...
View full post »

Similar threads

Zero lattice element hit in MCNP6 (but I cannot find the wrong area)
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Beginner Seeking Help: MCNP6 Burnup Example (OECD-NEA Benchmark)
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
529
How to Determine Fission Rate in MCNP6?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
MCNP6: Getting a "10 particles got lost" error
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Gamma electron coupled simulation
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Learning VisEd for MCNP
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
MCNP6 BURN Card Issue: Zero Burnup for Material in Fuel Assembly
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
493
How can I fix the illegal data signal error in my FMESH tally code in MCNP6?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
MCNP6: error -- "bad trouble in imcn" is usually tangled with spacing error?
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Troubleshooting MCNP6: 'Bad Trouble in Subroutine Source' & More
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K