Mean and autocorrrelation function

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter TomBombadil
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Mean
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on evaluating the mean and autocorrelation function of the random process defined as x(n) = v(n) + 3v(n-1), where v(n) represents a sequence of independent random variables with mean µ and variance s². The mean is correctly calculated as E[x(n)] = 4µ. However, the initial approach to derive the autocorrelation function r(n_1,n_2) contains a critical error in factorization, as the independence of v(n) does not apply when n1 and n2 differ by 1. The correct autocorrelation function is determined to be r(n_1,n_2) = 16µ².

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of random processes and their properties
  • Knowledge of expected value calculations
  • Familiarity with autocorrelation and cross-correlation definitions
  • Basic statistics, particularly regarding independent random variables
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of stationary processes in random variables
  • Learn about the implications of independence in random processes
  • Explore autocorrelation function derivations in depth
  • Review definitions and applications of cross-correlation in signal processing
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, statisticians, and engineers working with random processes, particularly those involved in signal processing and time series analysis.

TomBombadil
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to solve a random process problem:

"Let [itex]x(n) = v(n) + 3v(n-1)[/itex] where [itex]v(n)[/itex] is a sequence of independent random variables with mean µ and variance s². Whats its mean and autocorrelation function? Is this process stationary? Justifiy."

To discover the mean, I applied the expected value at x(n):

[itex]E[x(n)] = E[ v(n) ] + 3 E[v(n-1)] = \mu + 3\mu = 4\mu[/itex]

To obtain the autocorrelation function:

[itex]r(n_1,n_2) = E[x(n_1)x(n_2)] = E[v(n_1)v(n_2) +3v(n_1)v(n_2 -1) + 3v(n_1-1)v(n_2) + 9v(n_1 -1)v(n_2-1)][/itex]

Since v(n) is an independent sequence..
[itex]r(n_1,n_2) = E[v(n_1)] E[v(n_2)] + 3E[v(n_1)] E[v(n_2-1)] + 3 E[v(n_1-1)] E[v(n_2)] + 9 E[v(n_1 -1 ) ] E[v(n_2 -1)][/itex]

But [itex]E[v(n)] = \mu[/itex], then

[itex]r(n_1,n_2) = \mu^2 + 3\mu^2 + 3 \mu^2 + 9 \mu^2 = 16\mu^2[/itex]

I'm afraid that I made mistake evaluating the autocorrelation function..So, is there any error? If yes, could someone correct me? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your mistake is here
TomBombadil said:
To obtain the autocorrelation function:

[itex]r(n_1,n_2) = E[x(n_1)x(n_2)] = E[v(n_1)v(n_2) +3v(n_1)v(n_2 -1) + 3v(n_1-1)v(n_2) + 9v(n_1 -1)v(n_2-1)][/itex]

Cross-correlation is defined as

[itex]\rho_j=\sum_{k=-\infty}^{\infty} x_k y_{k+j}[/itex]

so the factorization you tried to do is not allowed. (Note that definitions vary. Sometimes c-correlation is defined as

[itex]\rho_j=\sum_{k=-\infty}^{\infty} (x_k - \mu_x)(y_{k+j} - \mu_y)[/itex]

instead. Use the definition from your text or class.)

Modify this to fit your problem and it should work out better.
 
If n1 and n2 differ by 1, then one of the terms of r(n1,n2) cannot be split up as a product of expectations, since the argument for both v's in the product would be the same.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
803
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K