Meaning of Gravitational Field Outside Uniform Sphere

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of a statement regarding the gravitational field outside a uniform sphere of mass M, specifically comparing it to that of a point mass M located at the center of the sphere.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of gravitational field equations and question the validity of comparing gravitational fields at different points, particularly at the center versus outside the sphere.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered clarifications regarding the comparison being made between gravitational fields at specific distances from a uniform sphere and a point mass. There is ongoing exploration of the implications of the gravitational field at various distances.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential confusion arising from the reference to r = 0 and the undefined nature of gravitational field calculations at that point. The focus remains on the gravitational field outside the sphere and the assumptions involved in the comparison.

songoku
Messages
2,514
Reaction score
395

Homework Statement



I found this statement from my book :
For points outside a uniform sphere of mass M, the gravitational fields is the same as that of a point mass M at the center of the sphere.
My question : what is the meaning of it?

Homework Equations


[tex]g=G\frac{M}{r^2}[/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution


I don't think it will be the same.
At the center of the sphere, r = 0 and g will be infinite ??
And for point outside a uniform sphere, for a certain value of r, the point will have certain value of g, so how can they be the same?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
songoku said:
At the center of the sphere, r = 0 and g will be infinite ??
They are talking about outside a uniform sphere of mass M. What's that got to do with r = 0? (At r=0, M=0 also. So the division will be undefined.)
And for point outside a uniform sphere, for a certain value of r, the point will have certain value of g, so how can they be the same?
Why don't you figure it out and see? What's the value of g immediately above the surface of that uniform sphere of mass M and radius R. What's the g value at a distance R from a point mass M?
 
Hi Doc Al
Doc Al said:
They are talking about outside a uniform sphere of mass M. What's that got to do with r = 0? (At r=0, M=0 also. So the division will be undefined.)
I interpret the statement is about comparison between gravitational field of point outside the sphere and the point at center of the sphere, that's why I tried to find g at r = 0. Maybe I am wrong but I keep thinking like that based on the question I read. Am I wong?

Why don't you figure it out and see? What's the value of g immediately above the surface of that uniform sphere of mass M and radius R. What's the g value at a distance R from a point mass M?

The value of immediately above the surface of that uniform sphere of mass M and radius R :

[tex]g=G\frac{M}{R^2}[/tex]

The g value at a distance R from a point mass M is the same as above.

But outside the sphere can be the point located 2R from the mass M, so the value of g will be different.

Thanks
 
Usually in physics we deal with point particles. What they're saying is that if you're taking into account a gravitational field from a body of mass, such as Earth's, you're taking into account a bunch of point masses...so the question is what is Earth's gravitational field? For uniform spheres of mass, it turns out that it is the same as a point particle (except in cases when you're inside the sphere). The Earth isn't a uniform sphere, but this perspective in general does help.
 
Last edited:
songoku said:
I interpret the statement is about comparison between gravitational field of point outside the sphere and the point at center of the sphere, that's why I tried to find g at r = 0. Maybe I am wrong but I keep thinking like that based on the question I read. Am I wong?
Yes, I'd say you are interpreting it incorrectly. They are comparing the field at a distance r from the center of a uniform sphere of mass M (as long as r > radius of the sphere) with the field at a distance r from a point mass M. The field is the same for both. At no point are you comparing anything at r = 0.


The value of immediately above the surface of that uniform sphere of mass M and radius R :

[tex]g=G\frac{M}{R^2}[/tex]

The g value at a distance R from a point mass M is the same as above.

But outside the sphere can be the point located 2R from the mass M, so the value of g will be different.
Exactly.
 
Hi Doc Al and Gear300

Ahh, I see what you mean, Doc Al. And now I can also see what the statement really means.

Thanks a lot !
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K