Measure of limit of decreasing sequence

  • Thread starter e12514
  • Start date
30
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

If E_1, E_2, ... is a sequence (of subsets of R^n) that decreases to E
(i.e. E_m+1 is a subset of E_m for all m, and E = intersection of all the E_m's)
and some E_k has finite (lebesgue) measure, i.e. lambda(E_k) is finite
it is a known result that the measure of E is equal to the limit of the measure of E_m.

But now if we are given some bounded set E
and we define E_m = { x : d(x,E) < 1/m }
where d(x,E) = minimum distance from x to any point in set E,
then howcome we have lambda(E) = lim_m->oo lambda( E_m ) when E is closed
but not when E is open?

Doesn't the fact that E is bounded imply some E_k has finite measure, and hence the above result applies, regardless whether E is open or closed or neither?
 

Answers and Replies

fresh_42
Mentor
Insights Author
2018 Award
12,053
8,433
Yes, the Lebesgue measure of E doesn't depend on whether E is open or not.
 

Related Threads for: Measure of limit of decreasing sequence

  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
800
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Top