Measure of limit of decreasing sequence

  • Thread starter e12514
  • Start date
  • #1
e12514
30
0
If E_1, E_2, ... is a sequence (of subsets of R^n) that decreases to E
(i.e. E_m+1 is a subset of E_m for all m, and E = intersection of all the E_m's)
and some E_k has finite (lebesgue) measure, i.e. lambda(E_k) is finite
it is a known result that the measure of E is equal to the limit of the measure of E_m.

But now if we are given some bounded set E
and we define E_m = { x : d(x,E) < 1/m }
where d(x,E) = minimum distance from x to any point in set E,
then howcome we have lambda(E) = lim_m->oo lambda( E_m ) when E is closed
but not when E is open?

Doesn't the fact that E is bounded imply some E_k has finite measure, and hence the above result applies, regardless whether E is open or closed or neither?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
fresh_42
Mentor
Insights Author
2021 Award
17,607
18,180
Yes, the Lebesgue measure of E doesn't depend on whether E is open or not.
 

Suggested for: Measure of limit of decreasing sequence

Replies
2
Views
423
Replies
1
Views
323
Replies
3
Views
497
Replies
1
Views
406
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
84
Replies
6
Views
609
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
727
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
921
Replies
9
Views
497
Top