Measure Theory-LebesgueMeasurable

  • Thread starter Thread starter WannaBe22
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measure
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 1K views
WannaBe22
Messages
73
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Is there any non-Lebesgue-Measurable set A in R such as A contains all rational numbers?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I've tried assuming that this is true... If such a set exists, then both [tex]A[/tex] and [tex]A^c[/tex] aren't countable... I've tried looking at [tex]A^c[/tex] ... It's a non-countable set containing only non-rational numbers...I can't find any contradiction from this fact...
[I'm pretty sure the answer to the given question is no...]

Hope you'll be able to help me

Thanks !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't try to construct a nonmeasurable set in such a way that it contains all of [tex]\mathbb{Q}[/tex]. Instead, approach the problem in two parts: first get yourself a nonmeasurable set, then try to figure out whether you can make it contain [tex]\mathbb{Q}[/tex] and still be nonmeasurable.
 
Well...After reading your guidance , I've tried taking the "Vitali Set" (The subset of
[-0.5,0.5] which, for each real number r, contains exactly one number v such that v-r is rational )... If we'll denote this set as P, then we need to consider [tex]P \cup Q[/tex].
P is nonmeasurable and contains excatly one rational numbers...I can't figure out whether our "union set" is measurable or not... We've added to P a set of measure 0...Does the new set is measurable or not?

Hope you'll be able to continue your guidance...

Thanks !
 
You have reduced the problem to exactly the question you need to answer. Let [tex]A \subset \mathbb{R}[/tex] be any set, and [tex]Z \subset \mathbb{R}[/tex] be a set of measure zero. How is the measurability or nonmeasurability of [tex]A \cup Z[/tex] related to that of [tex]A[/tex]? (What test for measurability should you be using to answer this question?)
 
Well... [tex]Z[/tex] is obviously measurable...If [tex]A[/tex] is also measurable then [tex]A \cup Z[/tex] is also measurable... Hence, if [tex]A \cup Z[/tex] is nonmeasurable , [tex]A[/tex] must be nonmeasurable... So, if we take a nonmeasurable set [tex]A[/tex], containing all rational numbers, [tex]A-Q[/tex] must also be nonmeasurable...But [tex]A-Q[/tex] is a set contained in the irrational numbers set... Is it a contradiction?
As you can see, I'm pretty much stuck... Hope you'll be able to give me some further guidance

Thanks !