Measurement in de broglie-bohm theory

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cryptist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measurement Theory
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the de Broglie-Bohm (dBB) theory, particularly focusing on the mechanisms involved "before the measurement," the nature of measurement and its effects, the guiding function, and the relationship between the wave function and guiding function. Participants explore concepts related to quantum measurement, decoherence, and the implications for particle behavior in various scenarios, including the double-slit experiment.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about the "before the measurement" mechanism in dBB theory and whether there is a real collapse during measurement.
  • One participant asserts that while the particle's position can be calculated using the guiding function, it cannot be measured without disturbance.
  • Questions arise regarding the disappearance of the interference pattern in the double-slit experiment upon measurement, with some attributing this to decoherence of the wave function.
  • There are claims that decoherence is irreversible, leading to further questions about the effects of measurement on the guiding function.
  • Some participants argue that measurement affects the path of the particle, suggesting a conflict between the guiding function and the wave function.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the distinction between the guiding function and the wave function, with one participant stating they are the same in dBB theory.
  • Discussions also touch on the linguistic precision of questions regarding the effects of measurement on the guiding function.
  • Further inquiries are made about the nature of decoherence and configuration space, with a suggestion that these topics are broader than dBB theory.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the effects of measurement and decoherence, with no consensus reached on the implications for the guiding function and wave function. Some participants agree on certain aspects, such as the irreversibility of decoherence, while others challenge or refine these claims.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of measurement and guiding function, as well as unresolved questions about the nature of decoherence and its implications for the dBB framework.

cryptist
Messages
121
Reaction score
1
Hi,
Could you describe the "before the measurement" mechanism in de broglie bohm theory? Is there a real collapse during the measurement? Can we determine the particle's position in its guiding function without disturbing it? Is there any way to calculate guiding function?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
cryptist said:
Could you describe the "before the measurement" mechanism in de broglie bohm theory?
The theory of quantum measurements in dBB theory is described in many books and papers. Instead of repeating it here, I think it is better to point to a reference where it has already been done. An easily accessible example is the Appendix of
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/020818 [Found.Phys.Lett. 17 (2004) 363]
See also the recent discussion in
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=444233

cryptist said:
Is there a real collapse during the measurement?
No.

cryptist said:
Can we determine the particle's position in its guiding function without disturbing it?
We can calculate it, but we cannot measure it (without disturbing it).

cryptist said:
Is there any way to calculate guiding function?
Of course, by solving the Schrödinger equation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Then, for example in double slit experiment, why the interference pattern disappears when we are measuring the particle? Why it would not reappear when we stop measuring it?
Does the measuring particle effects somehow guiding function? After all it is the guiding function that determines its path right?
 
cryptist said:
Then, for example in double slit experiment, why the interference pattern disappears when we are measuring the particle?
Because measurement causes decoherence of the wave function.

cryptist said:
Why it would not reappear when we stop measuring it?
Because decoherence is irreversible.

cryptist said:
Does the measuring particle effects somehow guiding function?
No.

cryptist said:
After all it is the guiding function that determines its path right?
Right.
 
But the measurement affects the path of the particle say electron. Since guiding function determines the path, shouldn't it also be effected? For example in the interference pattern we see that electrons in the screen that cannot be there classically. That means electron's path changes with the act of measurement or by decoherence.
 
cryptist said:
But the measurement affects the path of the particle say electron.
True. But it is important to stress that here "measurement" is a process that refers to the evolution of the WAVE FUNCTION. The change of the wave function then causes a change in the motion of the particle.

cryptist said:
Since guiding function determines the path, shouldn't it also be effected?
No, the wave function is not affected by the particle's path.

cryptist said:
For example in the interference pattern we see that electrons in the screen that cannot be there classically. That means electron's path changes with the act of measurement or by decoherence.
True.
 
Then, what is the difference between guiding function and wave function?
 
cryptist said:
Then, what is the difference between guiding function and wave function?
In dBB theory, there is no difference between them. They are the same.
 
You said measuring particle is not effecting guiding function. But measurement changes the path, and path is determined by guiding function. Aren't these statements conflicting?
 
  • #10
cryptist said:
You said measuring particle is not effecting guiding function.
I answered "no" to your question, but your question was slightly imprecise in a linguistic sense.
What I meant is that the MEASURED PARTICLE does not effect the guiding function. But the MEASUREMENT OF the particle does effect the guiding function.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Ok, I realized the confusion. That's my mistake. I wanted to say "whether measurement of particle effects guiding function or not?". Ok, I understand now.
 
  • #12
cryptist said:
Ok, I realized the confusion. That's my mistake. I wanted to say "whether measurement of particle effects guiding function or not?". Ok, I understand now.

You should say thanks for all the things Demystifier has helped you with.
 
  • #13
Kidphysics said:
You should say thanks for all the things Demystifier has helped you with.
The pleasure was mine. :smile:
 
  • #14
I did not close the topic, so I want to ask actually some other things after I finished my readings. So, of course I will thank you at the end. However, thank you Demystifier for your explanations so far. :)
 
  • #15
Demystifier said:
Because measurement causes decoherence of the wave function.

How this decoherence happens during measurement?

And, what is configuration space?
 
  • #16
cryptist said:
Hi,
Could you describe the "before the measurement" mechanism in de broglie bohm theory? Is there a real collapse during the measurement? Can we determine the particle's position in its guiding function without disturbing it? Is there any way to calculate guiding function?


dBB is a non collapse interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.



...‘No collapse’ interpretations avoid the measurement problem by selecting
other sets of observables as determinate for a system in a given quantum state...

http://www.psiquadrat.de/downloads/bub_clifton_uniqueness.pdf
 
  • #17
cryptist said:
How this decoherence happens during measurement?

And, what is configuration space?
These are questions for another topic, because they are much more general than dBB theory. Especially the second question. In fact, we already have a lot of threads concerning the first question, so try the search option to find some of them.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 376 ·
13
Replies
376
Views
25K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 78 ·
3
Replies
78
Views
16K