Measurement of (brightness of) double slit experiment

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the brightness of the light source and the resulting interference pattern in the double slit experiment. Participants also explore the conceptual differences between the double slit experiment and its quantum equivalent, as well as the feasibility of conducting such experiments at home.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that there is a proportional relationship between the brightness of the light source and the peaks in the interference pattern, though calculating the proportionality factor may be complex.
  • One participant notes that the number of photons hitting the detector remains constant regardless of slit separation, given other conditions are met.
  • There is uncertainty regarding the characterization of the double slit experiment as "standard" and the interferometer as "quantum," with some arguing both are pre-quantum experiments.
  • Participants discuss the practicality of conducting the double slit and interferometer experiments at home, with one asserting that they can be performed easily and inexpensively.
  • There is a question about whether the quantum version of the experiment can be anything other than a thought experiment, with some expressing skepticism about the feasibility of achieving the necessary conditions for detection.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between brightness and interference patterns, as well as the practical aspects of conducting these experiments. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the characterization of the experiments and their feasibility.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various assumptions regarding experimental conditions, such as slit width, distances, and exposure time, which may affect the outcomes discussed. There is also a lack of consensus on the definitions and implications of the terms used in describing the experiments.

Lino
Messages
309
Reaction score
4
Hi,

I think that this is (should be) a straight forward question: when conducting the double slit experiment, is there a relationship between the brightness / measure of the light source and the sum of the "peaks" from the interference pattern? (I have done a number of searches but can't find a specific answer to this - any links / references would be greatly appreciated.)

On a slightly different note, am I right in saying that the quantum equivelant of this experiment (light source, silevered mirrors, half silvered mirror, detectors, etc. arranged in a square) is an idealised / thought experiment of the standard experiment?


Regards,


Noel.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pretty simple relation - they are proportional. But that is not so easy to calculate the prortionality factor.
I am not so sure what experiment "in a square" you are thinking about. Some kind of interferometer probably. It is more or less related to double slit, but not strictly equivalent.
I don't understand why you call Young's double slit experiment "standard" and interferometer - "quantum". Both are pre-quantum - were conducted in 19th century.
 
The number of photons hitting the detector is the same regardless of the slit separation, assuming everything else is constant (slit width, distances, source brightness, exposure time) and assuming the angle subtended by the slit separation is very small as viewed from the source. That should give you your answer.
 
Thanks xts and Jeffkoch. Have you ever come across a good article / paper discussing this aspect of the experiment?

xts, I had only ever come across the interferometer version associated with quantum based discussions / articles - hence my misrepresentation - apologies. Especially given the 19th century reference, can this be anything other than a thought experiment? I kind of figured that, even with todays technology, getting the light so harmonised (if that's the right word) and then detecting it (or not) after it has passed through the arrangement would be exceptionall difficult or even (practically) impossible! Am I right?

Regards,

Noel.
 
can this be anything other than a thought experiment?
Both experiments: double slit and interferometer may be easily performed at home at cost of few € or none at all. Red laser pointer is a good light source for such play. Just a dark room, some alufoil with holes made with pins, wall as a screen, mirrors, piece of glass, etc.

My son performed Young's experiment when he was 11 years old ...

Google for hints how to make such experiments at home (you'll find lots of cases - from simples to be made in 10 mins, to more precise ones, but still at school level)
 
Thanks xts.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
55
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K