Measuring a Qubit: Understanding Pauli Matrices

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jimmycricket
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measuring Qubit
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Measuring a qubit's spin along a specific axis involves the use of Pauli matrices, particularly the Pauli Z operator, denoted as σ_z. The expectation value of this operator for a qubit in the state |ψ⟩ = c₀|0⟩ + c₁|1⟩ is calculated as ⟨ψ|σ_z|ψ⟩ = |c₁|² - |c₀|². This measurement indicates that if a qubit is measured N times, the outcomes will yield |1⟩ approximately |c₁|²N times and |0⟩ approximately (1 - |c₁|²)N times. The discussion also highlights the mathematical representation of the measurement process and suggests the introduction of a Hamiltonian H_meas = gA⊗M to couple the qubit to a measurement device.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum states and superposition
  • Familiarity with Pauli matrices, specifically σ_z
  • Knowledge of expectation values in quantum mechanics
  • Basic concepts of Hamiltonians in quantum systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical representation of quantum measurements using the Pauli matrices
  • Explore the role of Hamiltonians in quantum measurement processes
  • Read the suggested review on quantum measurement: http://dml.riken.jp/pub/nori/pdf/PhysRep.520.pdf (section 2.2.1)
  • Investigate the implications of measuring qubits in quantum computing applications
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers interested in quantum measurement techniques and their applications in quantum computing.

jimmycricket
Messages
115
Reaction score
2
I undertand that measuring a qubit's spin along a particular axis yields one of the eigenstates of the corresponding pauli matrices. I'm a little confused about what this type of measurement looks like mathematically. i.e how do you show the actual act of observing the qubits spin using the Pauli matrices?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's say that your qubit is in the state ##\vert\psi\rangle = c_0 \vert 0 \rangle + c_1 \vert 1 \rangle##, a simplistic description of a measurement along the ##z## direction is given by evaluating the expectation value of the Pauli ##z## operator, which is ##\langle\psi\vert\sigma_z\vert\psi\rangle = \vert c_1\vert^2 - \vert c_0\vert^2##. (if ##\sigma_z\vert 0\rangle =-\vert 0\rangle##).

Which means that if you measure your qubit ##N## times, you will obtain on average ##\vert c_1\vert^2 N## times ##\vert 1\rangle##, and the rest ##\left( 1- \vert c_1\vert^2\right) N = \vert c_0\vert^2 N## times ##\vert 0\rangle##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jimmycricket
matteo137 said:
Which means that if you measure your qubit ##N## times
But you can't do that. It means that given an ensemble of ##N## identically prepared systems...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jimmycricket
DrClaude said:
But you can't do that. It means that given an ensemble of ##N## identically prepared systems...

Yes of course, I was too imprecise, sorry.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jimmycricket
jimmycricket said:
I undertand that measuring a qubit's spin along a particular axis yields one of the eigenstates of the corresponding pauli matrices. I'm a little confused about what this type of measurement looks like mathematically. i.e how do you show the actual act of observing the qubits spin using the Pauli matrices?
There is no mathematical operation you can make, apart from saying that before a measurement of observable ##\hat{A}##, with
$$
\hat{A} | \phi_i \rangle = a_i | \phi_i \rangle
$$
the system is in the state
$$
| \psi \rangle = \sum c_i | \phi_i \rangle
$$
and after having measured the value ##a_j##, it is in the state
$$
| \psi \rangle = | \phi_j \rangle
$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jimmycricket
DrClaude said:
There is no mathematical operation you can make

Actually there is. You can say that you are making a measurement by introducing the Hamiltonian
H_{\text{meas}} = g A\otimes M
which couples the qubit to a meter ...

I can suggest you this good review: http://dml.riken.jp/pub/nori/pdf/PhysRep.520.pdf (section 2.2.1)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jimmycricket

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K