Measuring Distance: How Far Are Stars?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter iGen3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measuring
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the methods used to measure the distance of stars, particularly focusing on concepts like parallax, brightness, and specific types of stars that serve as distance indicators. Participants explore how these measurements are standardized and the implications of varying star brightness.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how distances to stars are measured and expresses confusion about the role of brightness in these measurements.
  • Another participant introduces parallax as a fundamental method for measuring distances to nearby stars and suggests that it serves as a basis for other distance measurements.
  • A later reply discusses how stars exhibit brightness patterns based on their size and age, which can help standardize distance measurements. It mentions specific types of stars, such as certain variable stars and supernovae, as accurate distance indicators.
  • Further, it is noted that over longer distances, the Doppler shift is utilized, contingent upon the validity of Hubble's theory of expansion, which posits that recession speed varies with distance.
  • Another participant asserts that Cepheid variables and Type Ia supernovae provide strong, independent confirmations of the Hubble flow and claims they are foundational to the LCDM model, countering suggestions that they are model dependent.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on the methods of measuring distances to stars, with some supporting the use of parallax and specific star types, while others emphasize the role of Doppler shift and the Hubble flow. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these methods and their interdependencies.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on specific assumptions about star brightness and the validity of cosmological models like LCDM. The discussion does not resolve the complexities involved in measuring astronomical distances.

iGen3
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello,

This may be a dumb question, but I by no means have any background in Astronomy, I'm pretty much regulated to Science Channel, History Channel, etc. I wish I could dive into all the fields on these forums but unfortunately I was not blessed with the gifts of understanding mathematics or physics beyond a basic level.

My question is how do you measure the distance of stars when it's light reaches us? I understand we can see that some planets are closer to us with depth perception, but what happens when we lose track of that depth perception?

I guess I'm just wondering how we know if something is 5 million light years from us vs. 7 million light years?

If I were to flash a light beam at you in pitch black from 10 feet vs. 100 feet, that light I assume would be smaller and dimmer from 100 feet, so you could assume that it was farther. But if I used a brigher flashlight at 100 ft and a much weaker, dimmer flashlight at 10 feet wouldn't it appear to be the same? If all stars vary in brightness (which I assumed is true) how do we standardize distance?

Thanks for the input.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
This is a very good question. Distance measures are very important in astronomy and cosmology at a whole range of scales. To get you started have a look at the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distance_ladder" article.

The most fundamental distance measure is Parallax, which can be used on stars relatively close to us in our own galaxy only. This is the first distance measure to understand and pretty much everything else is calibrated in the end from parallax.

Anything that you don't understand or need more info about just ask away.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
iGen3 said:
If I were to flash a light beam at you in pitch black from 10 feet vs. 100 feet, that light I assume would be smaller and dimmer from 100 feet, so you could assume that it was farther. But if I used a brigher flashlight at 100 ft and a much weaker, dimmer flashlight at 10 feet wouldn't it appear to be the same? If all stars vary in brightness (which I assumed is true) how do we standardize distance?
Good thought. It turns out that stars all follow brightness patterns based on their size and age, which can be determined by their color. This provides a rough ruler for the measurement you suggest. Some very specific types of stars, such as certain types of variable stars and certain types of supernovas have very specific brightness, which makes them very accurate rulers for that type of measurement.

Over much longer distances, doppler shift is used, under the assumption that the Hubble's theory on expansion is valid (recession speed varies with distance).
 
Cepheids and SN Ia's are powerful [backed by solid physics] independent confirmations of the Hubble flow. They are not model dependent [cosmologically] as LCDM opponents sometimes suggest. In fact, they are the foundation for the LCDM model.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K