Measuring instant changes in particles

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cybercrypt13
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measuring Particles
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the measurement of instant changes in entangled particles, particularly focusing on the implications of experiments demonstrating that entangled particles affect each other instantaneously when one is measured. Participants explore the challenges of measuring such phenomena and the interpretations of the results, including the role of light speed and the nature of entanglement.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the methodology used to determine that one entangled particle's measurement instantaneously affects another, suggesting that the measurement process may not be straightforward.
  • Another participant mentions parametric down conversion (PDC) as a relevant experimental setup but does not elaborate on its implications for the discussion.
  • A participant asserts that while synchronized clocks could theoretically demonstrate faster-than-light effects, there is no definitive proof that anything travels instantly between detectors, indicating that this is just one possible interpretation.
  • Concerns are raised about the feasibility of detecting minute differences in measurements over distances, suggesting skepticism about the ability to observe such instantaneous effects.
  • One participant reflects on the nature of particle measurement, questioning whether particles are always in opposite states after entanglement and whether the observed effects might be illusory.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of entanglement and the measurement process, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in current understanding, including the challenges of measuring instantaneous effects and the potential for misinterpretation of experimental results. There is an acknowledgment that the nature of entanglement and its implications are complex and not fully settled.

cybercrypt13
Messages
87
Reaction score
0
There are many experiments that supposedly prove that two entangled particles instantly effect each other when one is touched. I know I don't have to explain this since you all seem to understand it so well, but basically the two particles fly apart and we measure one's spin and the other is instantly effected beyond the speed of light.

Well, my question is: What on Earth are we using to make such a determination? Do we have some camera that is capable of measuring frames for each light second? To us, light instantly flies across the room, but we know this is not true. But to measure such a thing is no simple exercise. So during the test where we entangled two particles, watched the fly apart and then attempt to measure one, Who is standing across the room or across the ocean on another island that can say that the measure of the first instantly effected the second?

Thanks for you explanations,

glenn
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your answer in short is : Parametric down conversion, ie PDC. There is a nice paper that explains the experimental setup in a fairly easy language. Just google for it or do a search on this forum for PDC !

marlon
 
cybercrypt13 said:
So during the test where we entangled two particles, watched the fly apart and then attempt to measure one, Who is standing across the room or across the ocean on another island that can say that the measure of the first instantly effected the second?

1. One can ensure that the speed of light was exceeded by using synchronized clocks. No big deal about that.

2. There is no proof that something traveled instantly between the two detectors. It is one possible explanation, but not the only one. It has been proven that no information can be sent faster than light by using entanglement so the whole thing could be an illusion.
 
Thanks, I just think about how fast light truly travels, consider two people at two locations a few miles apart at most trying to detect the difference between two events and doubt very seriously they'd detect such a minute thing.

I'm also still studying up on the PDC experiment but from what I've learned so far it seems the particles can only be measured once. Its not like they physically can be stuck in a box and someone can pop the lid open over and over on them and say, green, red, red, green... and check it on the other end to see what they are doing. At least I'm not seeing how this would be done at this point in my studies.

If this is the case then I would question whether anything at all is changing, or if the particles are always oposite of each other after the point of entanglement and we're just placing beliefs in something that may not exist at all.

Again, I'm only talking out loud as I"m not done reading on the experiment yet.

Thanks again,

glenn
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K