Measuring Productivity: 2 Main Multifactor Measures

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on two primary multifactor productivity measures: (1) total output divided by the sum of labor, capital, and intermediate inputs, and (2) value added divided by the sum of labor and capital. A debate arises regarding the validity of using value added divided by the total of labor, capital, and intermediate inputs, as suggested by a teacher. Participants argue that including intermediate inputs in the denominator does not accurately reflect productivity since these inputs do not contribute to value added. The consensus leans towards maintaining the integrity of the original ratio by adjusting both the numerator and denominator equally when accounting for intermediate inputs.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of multifactor productivity measures
  • Familiarity with economic concepts of value added
  • Knowledge of labor and capital inputs in production
  • Basic mathematical skills for ratio calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advanced multifactor productivity analysis techniques
  • Explore the implications of intermediate inputs on productivity metrics
  • Learn about economic efficiency and its measurement
  • Investigate case studies on productivity improvement in various industries
USEFUL FOR

Economists, business analysts, productivity consultants, and anyone involved in measuring and improving organizational efficiency will benefit from this discussion.

luis20
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
I found on the internet that there are 2 main multifactor productivity measures:

1) total output / (labour + capital + intermediate inputs)

2) value added / (labour + capital)

, where value added = total output - intermediate inputsThis two measures make sense but my teacher said that if we want total productivity and use value added we should do:

value added / (labour + capital + intermediate inputs)

This measure makes no sense to me, since intermediate inputs do not produce value added.
What do you think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you need more intermediate inputs to add the same value, something is worse, so you might want some index to go down.
 
mfb said:
If you need more intermediate inputs to add the same value, something is worse, so you might want some index to go down.

Yes, I would include losses of intermediate inputs in the denominator. But the amount I took from numerator shouldn't I take from denominator too? (since I know that amount is represented in both numerator and denominator)

I mean, if the original ratio is: output / input, then if I take the amount "a" from output, (and "a" is also included in input), I should take "a" from input, so it would be:

(output - a) / (input - a)

and not:

(output - a) / input

right?
 
Last edited:
value added = total output - intermediate inputs - (other variables)

You already use (output - a) / (input - a) in your formula, where a are intermediate inputs and (output-a) is "value added".
 
mfb said:
value added = total output - intermediate inputs - (other variables)

You already use (output - a) / (input - a) in your formula, where a are intermediate inputs and (output-a) is "value added".

Yes, but my teacher suggested this measure:

value added / (labour + capital + intermediate inputs)

which is:

(output - a) / inputThis is my actually question, is he wrong? ^^
 
If you use "a" as sum of all inputs, it is
(output - input) / input = output/input - 1

That is fine, and the value looks interesting.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 85 ·
3
Replies
85
Views
9K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K