Measuring Rabi Oscillations in a Two State Atom

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on measuring Rabi oscillations in a two-state atom, focusing on experimental methods and the underlying physics. Participants explore techniques for measuring the differential transmission of light through a two-level system, particularly in the context of quantum computing applications.

Discussion Character

  • Experimental/applied
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One proposed method for measuring Rabi oscillations is differential transmission in a pump-probe geometry, where a resonant probe pulse is transmitted through the two-level system while a stronger pump pulse is applied.
  • Participants discuss the meaning of a "stronger pulse," clarifying that it refers to higher intensity rather than frequency, and that the transmission measurement involves assessing how much of the probe pulse is not absorbed.
  • There is a suggestion to use a photodiode to measure the photocurrent created by the probe beam, comparing values with and without the pump beam to calculate differential transmission.
  • One participant expresses a desire for a simpler explanation of how the weak and strong pulses affect the energy levels of the two-level atom and how Rabi probabilities are detected.
  • Another participant explains the interaction of a single resonant photon with the two-level system, discussing absorption, stimulated emission, and the probabilities associated with the system's state.
  • The role of the pump pulse is described as preparing the state of the system, influencing the probabilities of finding the system in either the ground or excited state during measurement with the probe pulse.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the experimental setup and the basic principles involved, but there is no consensus on the clarity of the explanations provided, particularly regarding the underlying physics and terminology used.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express difficulty understanding the technical terms and concepts related to optical quantum physics, indicating a potential gap in knowledge that may affect their comprehension of the discussion.

Julian Blair
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Can someone give me a simple explanation of how to measure the Rabi probability oscillations in a two state atom?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One possible method is deifferential transmission in pump-probe geometry.

Measure the transmission of some resonant pulse through the two-level system (probe pulse). Now add a second stronger pulse slightly earlier, which also resonantly drives the transition (pump pulse). Now the measured differential transmission (with and without pump) of the probe pulse through the two-level system will show Rabi oscillations if you plot it against pulse area (usually proportional to the intensity) of the pump pulse.
 
Thanks Cthugha, you're the first person to reply with an experimental procedure. Unfortunately, I don't completely understand it! By a "stronger pulse" do you mean one at a higher frequency, or do you mean a longer pulse at the resonant frequency? It seems that you are measuring the transmission of the pulses, i.e. how much of the pulse is not absorbed, no? Can you explain exactly how one would measure the transmission or can you refer me to a paper where this is done?
I'm especially interested in measuring a qubit in quantum computing.
Thanks, again
 
Julian Blair said:
By a "stronger pulse" do you mean one at a higher frequency, or do you mean a longer pulse at the resonant frequency? It seems that you are measuring the transmission of the pulses, i.e. how much of the pulse is not absorbed, no? Can you explain exactly how one would measure the transmission or can you refer me to a paper where this is done?

By stronger I just mean higher intensity.

The idea is to measure the transmission of the weaker probe pulse. It is usually delayed a bit or is directed to the system at an angle with respect to the pump pulse, so that there is no overlap with the stronger pump pulse. Fortunately you do not need absolute transmission, so the procedure to measure it is quite easy. Essentially you just put a photo diode there and measure the photocurrent created by the probe beam with and without the pump beam being present. From these two values you can calculate the differential transmission. Now you do that for several pump beam intensities and you are done. Of course you may need higher sensitivity, e.g. if you are measuring on a single qubit. In that case you may want to take homodyne detection or lock-in detection into account additionally, but the basic technique is the same.

You could for example have a look at the following paper and references therein:
T.H. Stievater et al., "Rabi Oscillations of Excitons in Single Quantum Dots", Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 133603 (2001)
 
Thanks again Cthugha! Unfortunately, I'm not at all well versed in optical quantum physics, so I don't really know some of your terms. I looked at the paper you mentioned and it was definitely doing what I wanted to understand, but was way over my head in the details!
I assume that "higher intensity" means more photons per second. Is there some way you could explain for me (more simply!) in terms of the probabilities,
Snapshot.jpg
of the energy levels of the 2 level atom, how these are affected by the weak pulse and the pump pulse, so that the Rabi probabilities are detected?

Thanks Again!
 
Julian Blair said:
I assume that "higher intensity" means more photons per second.

Usually it is easier to consider the mean number of photons per pulse, but that of course also means more photons per second.

Julian Blair said:
Is there some way you could explain for me (more simply!) in terms of the probabilities,
View attachment 85033 of the energy levels of the 2 level atom, how these are affected by the weak pulse and the pump pulse, so that the Rabi probabilities are detected?

Ok, first consider the case of shooting a single resonant photon at the two level system (TLS). We are interested in the transmission of the system. This will of course depend on the state of the two-level system. Consider just a single run of the experiment first. If the TLS is in the ground state assuming ideal interaction the photon will be absorbed. Zero photons will be transmitted. If the system is in the upper state, the photon cannot be absorbed as there is no transition to higher energies left. However, there is a transition to lower energies resonant with the incoming photon, so stimulated emission will occur. The system will go to its ground state and will simultaneously emit a photon. So in that case, the transmitted number of photons when firing a single photon at the TLS will be two photons. If the TLS is in a superposition of the ground and the excited state, you may get different outcomes when you do the experiment. Either 0 photons or two photons and the relative probability of each of these events taking place is given by the probabilities you mention. This weak is essentially the role of the probe pulse. It is there to check the state of the system.

The role of the pump pulse is to prepare the state of the system. The situation is the same as described above, but you start from a well defined TLS in the ground state, now you shoot many photons at the TLS - and of course you do not have ideal interaction conditions in reality. However, what will happen is similar to the case above. For low photon numbers, not much will happen. The system is likely to stay in the ground state. For larger photon numbers, you will get a reasonable probability to find the system in the upper state. Adding even more photons, however, will not cause saturation at the upper level, but will cause stimulated emission to kick in. If you check the system now, it is more likely to find it in the ground state again. At some point you have gone full cycle and adding more photons will make it more likely to find the TLS in the upper state again and so on. The idea is that the pump pulse is a strong pulse that prepares the system and afterwards you check the state of the system with a probe pulse that is so weak that it (ideally) does not change the state of the system.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K