MHB Mechanics- connected particles

Shah 72
MHB
Messages
274
Reaction score
0
A bucket of mass 3kg rests on scaffolding at the top of a building. The scaffolding is 22.5m above the ground. The bucket is attached to a rope that passes over a smooth pulley. At the other end of the rope there is another bucket of mass 3kg, which initially rests on the ground. The bucket at the top of the building is filled with 6kg of bricks and is gently released. As this bucket descends the other bucket rises.
Find how long it will take the descending bucket to reach the ground.
I have no clue how to solve this.
Initially the acceleration is zero as both the buckets are at rest. R= 90N for the top bucket and T= 30N for the bottom bucket.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What have you tried? Did you start by sketching out a Free Body Diagram?

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
What have you tried? Did you start by sketching out a Free Body
20210524_131325.jpg
20210524_131332.jpg
20210524_131343.jpg
 
topsquark said:
What have you tried? Did you start by sketching out a Free Body Diagram?

-Dan
I think I realized where I have done the mistake. I need to calculate the F= m×a of the 9kg bucket going down taking its acceleration as negative and the bucket of 3 kg coming up acceleration as positive. I get t= 3s
Is this the right way? My freeborn diagram is wrong for the bucket that's on the top
 
057069FC-7566-42FE-9AB6-20D91B4E602D.jpeg
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top