I Mercury as a plasma at 150 Kelvin

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of creating mercury plasma at 150 Kelvin, with participants questioning the validity of such a theoretical engine. It is noted that at this temperature, mercury would likely be solid, contradicting the notion of it being in a plasma state. The low vapor pressure of mercury at 150 K means it cannot evaporate without significant heating, raising concerns about condensation on containment walls. Participants emphasize that pressurization alone cannot create plasma at such low temperatures. Ultimately, the thread concludes with a reminder to avoid engaging in pseudoscience discussions.
gary808
Messages
6
Reaction score
6
TL;DR
Can you have mercury as a plasma at 150 kelvin?
I was reading up on a theoretical engine employing the following, “Mercury plasma pressurized at 250k atmospheres, at a temperature of 150 degrees kelvin (-123° C), and swirled within its accelerator to 50k RPM.”

Does pressurizing mercury so much somehow allow a plasma to form at such sub-zero temperatures?
This seems to fly in the face of what I understand should be super-heated plasma.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Might help to say where you read it.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
Ibix said:
Might help to say where you read it.
Or maybe not, since the source was not valid. :wink:

@gary808 -- your question is "Can you have mercury as a plasma at 150 kelvin?" right? What defines a plasma? What parameters (like pressure) can affect the plasma state other than temperature?

gary808 said:
Does pressurizing mercury so much somehow allow a plasma to form at such sub-zero temperatures?
 
  • Like
Likes gary808 and Ibix
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, gary808, berkeman and 1 other person
berkeman said:
Or maybe not, since the source was not valid. :wink:

@gary808 -- your question is "Can you have mercury as a plasma at 150 kelvin?" right? What defines a plasma? What parameters (like pressure) can affect the plasma state other than temperature?
Yes. My point is in debunking pseudo-science. Just wanted to double-check with the experts. Pressurization isn't a factor. If it's 150 kelvin, then it is likely a solid, or else it's not 150 kelvin but a super-heated plasma instead.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
gary808 said:
Yes. My point is in debunking pseudo-science. Just wanted to double-check with the experts. Pressurization isn't a factor. If it's 150 kelvin, then it is likely a solid, or else it's not 150 kelvin but a super-heated plasma instead.
We don't debunk pseudoscience at PF. Thread is closed.
 
Thread 'Why higher speeds need more power if backward force is the same?'
Power = Force v Speed Power of my horse = 104kgx9.81m/s^2 x 0.732m/s = 1HP =746W Force/tension in rope stay the same if horse run at 0.73m/s or at 15m/s, so why then horse need to be more powerfull to pull at higher speed even if backward force at him(rope tension) stay the same? I understand that if I increase weight, it is hrader for horse to pull at higher speed because now is backward force increased, but don't understand why is harder to pull at higher speed if weight(backward force)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
16K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
23K