Graduate Metastable vacuum and tunneling

  • Thread starter Thread starter paralleltransport
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tunneling Vacuum
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the energy splitting between two classically degenerate minima in quantum field theory, specifically through the lens of instantons and theta vacua. Two methods are highlighted: one involves degenerate perturbation theory, while the other utilizes the saddle point expansion of the Euclidean path integral. The latter method considers classical trajectories in an inverted potential to compute the true vacuum energy. There is a query regarding the simplicity of these methods and whether they are adequately covered in the referenced material. The conversation aims to clarify these complex concepts in a more intuitive manner.
paralleltransport
Messages
128
Reaction score
97
TL;DR
I'd like to ask a few questions about QFT readings.
Hi all,

I'm currently reading about instantons and theta vacua (section 93, p 572 of http://web.physics.ucsb.edu/~mark/ms-qft-DRAFT.pdf)

Srednicki remarks in passing the following:
1642960650938.png


What is a good way to "see" 93.5 is true? Is there a slightly simpler way than below which is my current understanding (given srednicki just says this i assume there must be a simple intuition behind it)

For a a set of 2 classically degenerate minimum, the energy splitting between them can be computed 2 ways:
1. One way is to compute n′|H|m⟩. Degenerate perturbation theory says that the energy split will be proportional to this value.
2. The other method is to compute the saddle point expansion of the euclidean path integral. In this expansion one has to sum over all saddles. one of the saddle is a classical trajectory from vacuum n -> n' in an inverted potential. The energy of the true vacuum can be computed by taking the large time limit and the ln(Z) which will have an e^{S} term}2.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't this covered in chapter 9?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
9K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K