High School Metric Tensor and The Minkowski metric

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between the metric tensor in general relativity (GR) and the Minkowski metric, specifically the diagonal matrix {-1, +1, +1, +1}. It clarifies that the Kronecker delta, being a positive definite metric, cannot represent the indefinite metric required in GR or special relativity (SR). The conversation emphasizes that the Minkowski metric is chosen due to its invariance under Lorentz transformations, establishing that the fundamental geometry of our universe is Minkowski rather than Euclidean.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity and special relativity concepts
  • Familiarity with the metric tensor and its properties
  • Knowledge of Lorentz transformations
  • Basic grasp of differential equations and the Einstein field equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Minkowski metric in detail
  • Explore the implications of Lorentz transformations on spacetime geometry
  • Investigate the role of the stress-energy tensor in the Einstein field equations
  • Learn about gauge freedom in general relativity and its effects on metric tensors
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and students of theoretical physics who are interested in the foundations of general relativity and the geometric interpretation of spacetime.

sqljunkey
Messages
181
Reaction score
8
Hi,

I have seen the general form for the metric tensor in general relativity, but I don't understand how that math would create a Minkowski metric with the diagonal matrix {-1 +1 +1 +1}. I assume that using the kronecker delta to create the metric would produce a matrix that has all positive 1s in the diagonal. Are these numbers arbitrarily picked for certain "special" spaces?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In relativity you use an indefinite metric (also called pseudo-metric) which has signature +--- or -+++, depending on convention. The Kronecker delta is positive definite and therefore you cannot find any coordinate system where the metric used in GR or SR is the Kronecker delta (or, more accurately, where the metric is diagonal with ones on the diagonal - the Kronecker delta really is a (1,1) tensor, not a (0,2) tensor like the metric - however, you usually encounter it as the metric in Cartesian coordinates on a Euclidean space as it does not matter whether indices are covariant and contravariant in such coordinates).
 
Different numbers (well, functions) give different spaces - or can do. In principle you slot a stress-energy tensor into the Einstein field equation and solve the resulting system of differential equations to find the metric tensor. In practice that's quite difficult, and there is quite a lot of gauge freedom which means two different metric tensors can describe the same spacetime, just in different coordinates. You can always pick coordinates so that at one chosen point the metric is Minkowski. So everywhere the signature is -+++ (or +---). It will never be anything else.

The reason we picked the Minkowski metric is that Minkowski noticed that it is invariant under Lorentz transforms. So what the Lorentz transforms are telling you is that you live in a universe where the basic geometry is Minkowski, not Euclidean.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
935
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
879
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
805
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K