Metrics: Stationary & Rotating - Can They Coexist?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Emilie.Jung
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotating
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the compatibility of stationary and rotating metrics in the context of physics, particularly in relation to general relativity. Participants explore the implications of time-independence in metrics and how this relates to the concept of rotation.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether a metric can be both stationary and rotating, suggesting that time-independence implies a lack of rotation.
  • Another participant proposes that a metric can be stationary if it rotates consistently over time, referencing Killing vector fields as a means to describe this condition.
  • It is noted that a stationary state does not exclude motion; the state can remain unchanged while objects move within that framework.
  • A participant provides the example of the Kerr metric, which describes a rotating black hole with time-independent metric coefficients, to illustrate that rotation can exist without altering the metric itself.
  • An analogy is drawn between stationary metrics and heat conduction in a wall, where temperature can reach a stationary state despite ongoing heat flow, suggesting a similar relationship for metrics and motion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between stationary and rotating metrics. While some argue that there is no contradiction, others remain uncertain about how rotation can coexist with time-independence in metrics.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the definitions of stationary and rotating metrics, as well as the implications of motion within a stationary state. There are unresolved nuances regarding the interpretation of these concepts.

Emilie.Jung
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
Can metrics be stationary and rotating at the same time? Doesn't stationary here means that the metric is time-independent. Thus, if a metric is time-indepedent how could it be rotating?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
As long as it is rotating the same today as it was yesterday. This can be described in terms of Killing vector fields.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Emilie.Jung
So there isn't a contradiction there? If something is rotating, say earth, the east hemisphere could be at point x in space and after a few hours it will be at point x'. What do you say?? @Dale
 
Generally a stationary state does not exclude motion. This is true here as well as in other areas of physics. The state being stationary only implies that it does not change with time. Things can move, but the state will look the same after that movement.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Emilie.Jung
Emilie.Jung said:
if a metric is time-indepedent how could it be rotating?

Because there are rotating metrics in which none of the metric coefficients depend on time. For example, the Kerr metric describes a rotating black hole; none of its metric coefficients depend on time. (A more rigorous definition would be in terms of Killing vector fields, as Dale says.)

Emilie.Jung said:
the east hemisphere could be at point x in space and after a few hours it will be at point x'

That doesn't change the metric--the geometry of spacetime. It just changes the locations of particular points on the Earth. The definition of "stationary", as you said in the OP, is that the metric is independent of time. It is not that the positions of all objects are independent of time.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Emilie.Jung
Just to take a completely unrelated example. Consider the heat conduction through a homogeneous wall in winter (it is cold outside and we wish to keep it warm inside). If the inside and outside temperatures are held constant and different, there temperature in the wall will eventually reach a stationary state. This does not mean that heat is not flowing through the wall - we definitely still need to keep the radiators on to keep it warm inside.

The same idea applies here. Whereas things may be moving, this does not affect the metric, which can be stationary in the same way as the temperature distribution can be stationary in the wall even though heat was flowing.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Emilie.Jung
Emilie.Jung said:
So there isn't a contradiction there? If something is rotating, say earth, the east hemisphere could be at point x in space and after a few hours it will be at point x'. What do you say?? @Dale
That doesn't change the metric. Stationary refers to the metric, not the matter.

Edit: I see the others have explained this in more detail
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K