MHV /Parke-Taylor/BCFW references

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mordred
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding quality literature regarding MHV (Maximal Helicity Violation) and Parke-Taylor amplitudes. Key references include a PDF from TUM and Lance Dixon's lecture notes available on arXiv, specifically the papers at https://arxiv.org/pdf/1310.5353 and https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ph/9601359. The user expresses a need for proofs validating the methodology used in these topics, indicating that while QFT (Quantum Field Theory) mathematics is manageable, string theory mathematics poses challenges. The conversation emphasizes the importance of thorough study of these resources for a deeper understanding.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Field Theory (QFT)
  • Familiarity with MHV and Parke-Taylor amplitudes
  • Basic knowledge of arXiv and academic literature retrieval
  • Ability to comprehend advanced mathematical concepts in theoretical physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Lance Dixon's lecture notes on MHV amplitudes at https://arxiv.org/pdf/1310.5353
  • Review Srednicki's QFT book for foundational concepts and references
  • Examine Muller's QCD handbook for additional context on QCD (Quantum Chromodynamics)
  • Research the proofs of validity for MHV and Parke-Taylor methodologies in academic journals
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, graduate students in particle physics, and researchers focusing on QFT and scattering amplitudes, particularly those interested in MHV and Parke-Taylor methodologies.

Mordred
Science Advisor
Messages
2,243
Reaction score
169
I've been having some trouble finding good quality literature in regards to MHV and Parke-Taylor.

One of the better references I found being

https://www.ph.nat.tum.de/fileadmin/w00bya/ttpmath/pdf/sheet10-11.pdf

What I've having difficulty finding is the proofs for validity of the methodology specifically. Any recommendations appreciated.
Complexity of the literature isn't an issue the QFT mathematics wouldn't be an issue though string theory mathematics would be.
(Haven't looked at String theory in the last few years)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ohwilleke and Mordred
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ohwilleke, Mordred and Dr.AbeNikIanEdL
Many thanks for both links they both contain much of the relevant details Will take time to properly study though lol
 

Similar threads

AlphaEvolve - The Future of Math?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
983
ABC reference frame synchronous generator modelling in Ltspice
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Graduate Collapse in QM: in conflict with SR?
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Graduate How can modular forms be used in particle physics mass models?
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
Graduate Shinichi Mochizuki's ABC Conjecture and Replication Crisis in Maths
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
8K
High School QFT & QM Questions (about time, locality, gravity, etc.)
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Admissions Honest opinions and advice on Statement of Purpose requested
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
High School Questions on QFT & QM: Is QM or QFT Absolute Time?
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
7K
Graduate "The 7 Strangest Coincidences in the Laws of Nature" (S. Hossenfelder)
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
11K
Undergrad The standard model from loop quantum gravity via spinors octonions
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K