MHV /Parke-Taylor/BCFW references

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mordred
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding quality literature and references related to MHV (Maximal Helicity Violation) and Parke-Taylor formulas within the context of quantum field theory (QFT). Participants express interest in proofs of the methodologies involved and share various resources they have encountered.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in finding quality literature on MHV and Parke-Taylor, specifically seeking proofs for the validity of the methodologies.
  • Another participant suggests Lance Dixon's lecture notes as a potential resource.
  • A third participant reiterates the suggestion of Dixon's lecture notes and mentions another reference from Srednicki's QFT book, indicating a plan to read it after completing Muller's QCD handbook.
  • A later reply thanks the participants for the links provided, noting that they contain relevant details but will require time to study.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no explicit consensus on a single best reference, but participants generally agree on the usefulness of the suggested materials. Multiple resources are discussed without clear resolution on which is superior.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention varying levels of familiarity with string theory mathematics, indicating that while QFT mathematics is manageable, string theory may pose challenges. This suggests a potential limitation in the applicability of some references for certain participants.

Who May Find This Useful

Researchers or students interested in MHV, Parke-Taylor formulas, and related quantum field theory methodologies may find this discussion and the referenced materials useful.

Mordred
Science Advisor
Messages
2,243
Reaction score
169
I've been having some trouble finding good quality literature in regards to MHV and Parke-Taylor.

One of the better references I found being

https://www.ph.nat.tum.de/fileadmin/w00bya/ttpmath/pdf/sheet10-11.pdf

What I've having difficulty finding is the proofs for validity of the methodology specifically. Any recommendations appreciated.
Complexity of the literature isn't an issue the QFT mathematics wouldn't be an issue though string theory mathematics would be.
(Haven't looked at String theory in the last few years)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ohwilleke and Mordred
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ohwilleke, Mordred and Dr.AbeNikIanEdL
Many thanks for both links they both contain much of the relevant details Will take time to properly study though lol
 

Similar threads

AlphaEvolve - The Future of Math?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
ABC reference frame synchronous generator modelling in Ltspice
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Graduate Collapse in QM: in conflict with SR?
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Graduate How can modular forms be used in particle physics mass models?
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
Graduate Shinichi Mochizuki's ABC Conjecture and Replication Crisis in Maths
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
8K
High School QFT & QM Questions (about time, locality, gravity, etc.)
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Admissions Honest opinions and advice on Statement of Purpose requested
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
High School Questions on QFT & QM: Is QM or QFT Absolute Time?
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
7K
Graduate "The 7 Strangest Coincidences in the Laws of Nature" (S. Hossenfelder)
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
11K
Undergrad The standard model from loop quantum gravity via spinors octonions
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K