Minimum energy of an electron with the Larmor formula

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the minimum energy of an electron as derived from the Larmor formula and related equations. The Larmor formula indicates that the energy lost per revolution is given by ##\frac{|\Delta E|}{K} = \frac{8\pi v^3}{3c^3}##. As the radius approaches infinity, the energy approaches zero, while as the radius approaches zero, the energy approaches negative infinity. This analysis concludes that there is no minimum energy for the electron, as it continues to lose energy while spiraling inward, ultimately leading to the conclusion that classical physics fails to explain this behavior, necessitating quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Larmor formula and its application in classical electrodynamics.
  • Familiarity with potential energy equations, specifically ##V = -\frac{e^2}{r}##.
  • Knowledge of classical mechanics, particularly the relationship between force and radius, ##F = \frac{e^2}{r^2}##.
  • Basic grasp of energy calculations for charged particles, including ##E = -\frac{1}{2}\frac{e^2}{r}##.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of the Larmor formula in advanced electrodynamics.
  • Study quantum mechanics to understand the limitations of classical physics in explaining electron behavior.
  • Investigate the concept of energy quantization and its relevance to electron orbits.
  • Learn about the transition from classical to quantum models in atomic physics.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and researchers interested in classical electrodynamics, quantum mechanics, and the behavior of charged particles in electromagnetic fields.

doggydan42
Messages
169
Reaction score
18

Homework Statement


Is there a minimum value for the total energy of the electron (in this analysis)?

The previous parts:
Use Larmor formula to find ##\frac{|\Delta E|}{K}##, where ##|\Delta E|## is the energy lost per revolution.
the result is ##\frac{8\pi v^3}{3c^3}##.

##\frac{v(r)}{c}## was caluclated for r = 50 pm, 1pm, and 1 fm.

Lastly, ##t(50 pm \rightarrow 1 pm)## was calculated.

Homework Equations


Larmor Formula:
$$\frac{dE}{dt} = -\frac{2}{3}\frac{e^2a^2}{c^3}$$

Potential Energy:
$$V = -\frac{e^2}{r}$$

Magnitude of the force:
$$F = \frac{e^2}{r^2}$$

In another part of the problem, the velocity for radius r is calculated:
$$v(r) = \sqrt(\frac{e^2}{m_er})$$

The energy is also calculated to be:
$$E = -\frac{1}{2}\frac{e^2}{r}$$

The time it takes for the electron to spiral from ##r_i## to ##r_f## is:
$$t(r_i\rightarrow r_f) = \frac{m_e^2c^3}{4e^4}((r_i)^3-(r_f)^3)$$

The Attempt at a Solution


I have been trying to look at the formulas and see how if one variable increase what happens to dE/dt. If there was a minimum energy, there would be some r such that dE/dr = 0. This would be at negative and positive infinity radii. Pluggin the infinity into ##E = \frac{-e^2}{2r}## gives E = 0. So as the radius approaches infinity, the energy reaches a maximum, 0.

As the radius approaches 0, however, E approaches -infinity from the right, and infinity from the left. So would the would we be able to say there is a minimum energy at the limit of E as r approaches 0+?

Is there a better way to go about solving this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Would the fact that E goes to -infinity mean that that there is no minimum energy? The electron would keep getting closer to the center of the orbit, never reaching, but decreasing in energy all the while?
 
doggydan42 said:
Would the fact that E goes to -infinity mean that that there is no minimum energy? The electron would keep getting closer to the center of the orbit, never reaching, but decreasing in energy all the while?
I did not double check all your calculations but the conclusion is that yes, classically the electron would crash into the proton. That was one of the key difficulties with classical physics that led to the need for quantum mechanics.

By the way, you say that it would never reach r=0. But your formula shows that it would reach r=0 in a finite amount of time, as we see by just plugging rf=0 in the equation (I am assuming that ri is not infinite).
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
697
Replies
46
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K