Minimum speed on banking road (circular motion)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a car navigating a banked curve with a specific radius, banking angle, and coefficient of friction. The original poster seeks to determine the minimum speed required to prevent slipping.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the forces acting on the car, including normal force and friction, and question the correctness of the original poster's equations. There is an exploration of the direction of friction based on speed and the need to consider vertical forces.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, providing guidance on checking equations and considering the effects of friction. There is recognition of the need to include friction's vertical component in the analysis.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the importance of clearly defining axes and the implications of speed on the direction of friction. The discussion reflects uncertainty regarding the correct setup of forces in the problem.

Elbobo
Messages
145
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A car rounds a slippery curve. The radius of
curvature of the road is R, the banking angle
with respect to the horizontal is θ and the
coefficient of friction is μ.

What is the minimum speed required in order
for the car not to slip?

Homework Equations


Fc = (mv^2) / r
W = mg
Ffr = μ N


The Attempt at a Solution


So I made the xy-plane standard, weight in the negative y-direction.

x-direction:

Nx + Ffr(x) = Fc

N = (mg) / cos (th)

Ffr(x) = (μmg) cos (th) / cos (th)
= μ mg

Nx = [ (mg) sin (th) ] / cos (th)

Nx + Ffr(x) = Fc
μmg + (mg sin (th))/cos (th) = (mv^2) / r
v(min) = sqrt [ gr (μ + tan (th))]



That was my answer, but it's not an answer choice. I don't know where my thought process was wrong. Can someone help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Elbobo said:
So I made the xy-plane standard, weight in the negative y-direction.

It is good to clearly define an axis. In the next step, you have equated the forces along the x direction. What you should do next is to equate forces along the y direction, no?

In other words, can you check again if this equation is correct?

N = (mg) / cos (th)

Finally, you should think about what direction the friction force acts. If the car is going sloooowly, which direction (upwards or downwards) will it tend to slide?
 
naresh said:
It is good to clearly define an axis. In the next step, you have equated the forces along the x direction. What you should do next is to equate forces along the y direction, no?

In other words, can you check again if this equation is correct?



Finally, you should think about what direction the friction force acts. If the car is going sloooowly, which direction (upwards or downwards) will it tend to slide?

Yeah, but I don't see why it's not correct. I don't understand what other horizontal forces are acting. I thought the net force is always the centripetal force. Weight is perpendicular to the horizontal forces, so its component would be zero...



EDIT: oh right, so friction would act upwards? Didn't realize it would change depending on speed...
 
Your equation for the horizontal forces is perfect. I'm concerned about the equation relating N to mg.

Yes, friction opposes the direction of motion (or the direction in which the body is trying to move). If you move too fast, you can imagine that the friction acts downwards. In fact, this will mean that at some velocity, there will be no friction.
 
OH! I assumed the net force in the y direction equals zero.

N cos (th) - mg = 0
so N = mg / cos (th)

Yet I should've included friction's y component, right?
 
Elbobo said:
Yet I should've included friction's y component, right?

Yes, good job figuring this out. You should be able to work out the answer from here.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K