Minimum Time Interval: Experimental Evidence?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Craig Hogen's paper, "Indeterminacy of Holographic Quantum Geometry," published in Phys. Rev D 78, 087501 (2008), posits that noise detected by the GEO600 interferometric gravitational-wave detector indicates a fundamental minimum interval of time. Forum participants express skepticism about the longevity of Hogen's findings, predicting that advancements in the GEO600's technology will likely eliminate the noise, rendering the paper's conclusions irrelevant within six months to a year. The discussion highlights the current limitations of instrument sensitivity in detecting such fundamental phenomena.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of interferometric gravitational-wave detection
  • Familiarity with quantum geometry concepts
  • Knowledge of the GEO600 detector's operational principles
  • Awareness of scientific publication processes and impact assessment
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advancements in GEO600 technology and noise reduction techniques
  • Explore the implications of Hogen's theories on quantum mechanics
  • Study the historical context and impact of gravitational-wave detection
  • Investigate other papers discussing minimum time intervals in physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in quantum mechanics, and engineers involved in gravitational-wave detection will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the implications of instrument sensitivity and theoretical physics.

George Jones
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
7,643
Reaction score
1,602
Physics news on Phys.org
George Jones said:
Craig Hogen, in his paper Indeterminacy of Holographic Quantum Geometry, Phys. Rev D 78, 087501 (2008), has claimed noise seen in output of the GEO600 interferometric gravitational-wave detector is evidence for a fundamental minimum interval time.

What is the time-line for the survival of this timely result?

http://www.nature.com/news/2008/081110/full/news.2008.1217.html?s=news_rss

http://arxiv.org/abs/0806.0665

You are asking us to guess the future. This is impossible, but it is still a good exercise to try to do it (a way of testing one's own grasp of the situation.)

I will risk a forecast. I expect we will not remember this paper 6 months or a year from now. I think they will tweak the GEO rig and get rid of the noise and no one will care about Hogan's paper.

I hope I understood the spirit of your question about (future?) "time-line".
 
Agree with marcus. Instrument sensitivity is not quite at the 'chronon' level just yet IMO.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K