Discussion Overview
The discussion centers around the role of physics and mathematics in Mining Engineering compared to other engineering disciplines. Participants explore the curriculum requirements and the integration of physics with other fields such as geotechnical engineering and chemistry.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification
Main Points Raised
- One participant suggests that Mining Engineering requires only one year of "Calculus Based Physics," implying it may not be as physics-heavy as other disciplines.
- Another participant notes that Mining Engineering draws on topics from geotechnical engineering and chemistry, indicating a broader interdisciplinary approach.
- A different viewpoint mentions that the physics involved in Mining Engineering is comparable to that in civil or mechanical engineering, though it may not be explicitly emphasized in the curriculum.
- One participant shares anecdotal evidence about a friend studying Mining Engineering, highlighting the significant role of geology in the program and mentioning scholarship offers from the geology department.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express varying opinions on the extent to which Mining Engineering is physics and math heavy. There is no consensus on its comparative rigor relative to other engineering fields.
Contextual Notes
Some claims depend on specific curriculum structures and definitions of what constitutes "physics-heavy." The discussion does not resolve how different institutions may emphasize various aspects of Mining Engineering.