Minnesota?s Anti-Bullying Statute: Weakest in the Nation, Slated for Revision

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Revision
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around Minnesota's anti-bullying statute, which has been identified as the weakest among the states analyzed by the U.S. Department of Education. Participants explore the effectiveness of legislative measures in addressing bullying, the developmental aspects of youth behavior, and potential innovative approaches to encourage positive behavior among students.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants highlight that Minnesota's anti-bullying statute is the weakest according to a recent report, questioning the effectiveness of such legislation in truly preventing bullying.
  • One participant raises a philosophical question about whether legislation can effectively stop bullying or if it merely shifts the dynamics, potentially making schools the bullies instead of the students.
  • Another participant discusses the developmental stage of children and adolescents, emphasizing that their judgment and reasoning abilities are still maturing, which may contribute to risky behaviors.
  • A later reply suggests that societal attitudes and adult behaviors may influence youth, arguing that children are not as naive as perceived and can recognize adult hypocrisy.
  • One participant proposes an innovative approach to encourage good behavior through a points system that rewards proactive actions, suggesting that engagement in constructive activities could reduce instances of bullying.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effectiveness of legislation in combating bullying, with some questioning its impact while others propose alternative strategies. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to address bullying among youth.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of consensus on the effectiveness of current anti-bullying laws and the proposed solutions, as well as the complexity of youth behavior influenced by developmental factors and societal norms.

Messages
19,911
Reaction score
10,924
I’ve been saying it for a while now, but a new report by the U.S. Department of Education confirms that Minnesota’s anti-bullying statute is the weakest of the forty-six states it analyzed (four states, however, lacked state-wide polices altogether). *At … Continue reading →http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=virtualnavigator.wordpress.com&blog=11498882&post=787&subd=virtualnavigator&ref=&feed=1

Read More...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you really stop bulling though legislation or does this just make the school the bully instead of the kids?
 
The fact of the matter is, they’re children and adolescents, NOT ADULTS. They think and act like children and adolescents. Current research on brain development tells us that the frontal lobe of the brain (the part responsible for judgment and reasoning) surges in growth at about age 11 and isn’t done until about age 24. So, when we ask a youth why they ride a skate board down a railing without a helmet, no matter what they say, the answer is the same as to why someone would send their nude pictures through the phone or over the internet. They have not yet developed the judgment and reasoning to know and understand that it may be unsafe for them.
 
frank28 said:
The fact of the matter is, they’re children and adolescents, NOT ADULTS. They think and act like children and adolescents. Current research on brain development tells us that the frontal lobe of the brain (the part responsible for judgment and reasoning) surges in growth at about age 11 and isn’t done until about age 24. So, when we ask a youth why they ride a skate board down a railing without a helmet, no matter what they say, the answer is the same as to why someone would send their nude pictures through the phone or over the internet. They have not yet developed the judgment and reasoning to know and understand that it may be unsafe for them.
But then there are many adults that do questionable things. Just looking at the foreign policies of a few nations, it all seems more like schoolyard bully politics being played at the highest level. I don't think kids are as dumb as we make them out to be. They see the hypocrisy of adults and laugh at the whole "Do as I say, not as I do" attitude. Plus, we have a culture that celebrates aggressive winners, which is why people could loudly boo a presidential candidate that mentions the golden rule in a debate.

Personally, I'd like to see more emphasis put on engineering innovative incentives for good behavior. For example, create a Social Activity Points game where students race to collect points from teachers, staff and local groups by doing proactive tasks (community clean up, local marketing, class participation, reporting bullies, etc.). At the end of each quarter, they can trade in their points for gift certificates (funded by local businesses that benefit from the publicity and marketing). The goal should be to keep the students so busy with constructive activity (studying, sports, clubs or social points race) that they don't waste it by getting into trouble.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
6K