Supreme Court: GPS Tracking Requires a Warrant

[Greg Bernhardt]

Today marked a big win for privacy advocates. *The U.S. Supreme Court handed down a ruling on the question of whether it was Constitutional for police to attach a GPS tracking unit to someone’s vehicle without their consent, and without … Continue reading →http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=virtualnavigator.wordpress.com&blog=11498882&post=838&subd=virtualnavigator&ref=&feed=1

Read More...

 

[ViewsofMars]

Today marked a big win for privacy advocates. *The U.S. Supreme Court handed down a ruling on the question of whether it was Constitutional for police to attach a GPS tracking unit to someone’s vehicle without their consent, and without … Continue reading →http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=virtualnavigator.wordpress.com&blog=11498882&post=838&subd=virtualnavigator&ref=&feed=1

Read More...

Thanks Greg I can't believe there are policemen out there that wanted to 'attach a GPS tracking unit to someone's vehicle' without a warrent or consent by the owner of the vehicle. They forget about American democracy! United we stand!

 

[WhoWee]

Isn't information related to cell phone records, credit cards and services like OnStar now used against people in court?

 

[Pyrrhus]

Isn't information related to cell phone records, credit cards and services like OnStar now used against people in court?

Yes, Facebook posts and pictures, and also other social network information are also used as evidence against people in court.