Find MLE for f(y/x) = (x + 1)y^x, 0 < y < 1 and x > -1

  • Thread starter Thread starter J Flanders
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mle Statistics
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the Maximum Likelihood Estimator (MLE) for the probability density function f(y | x) = (x + 1)y^x, valid for 0 < y < 1 and x > -1. The likelihood function is expressed as L = (x + 1)^n * product of (y[i]^x), leading to the log-likelihood function. The user correctly identifies the need to take the derivative of the log-likelihood with respect to x and set it to zero to find the maximum. After simplification, they derive the estimator for x as [-n - ln(y1) - ln(y2) - ... - ln(yn)] / [ln(y1) + ... + ln(yn)]. The discussion concludes with a request for confirmation on the validity of this approach.
J Flanders
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
This is my question: Find the Maximum Likelihood Estimator for
f(y / x) = (x + 1)y^x, 0 < y < 1 and x > -1 OR 0, elsewhere.

I think this is how you get started, but I get confused. I'm not sure how to continue.
The likelihood function defined as the joint density of Y1, Y2, ..., Yn evaluated at y1, y2, ..., yn is given by
L = product from i = 1 to n of (x + 1)(yi^x) = (x + 1)^n * product from i = 1 to n of (yi^x).
I'm sorry for the notation. Any help is obviously appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your question can be restated as:

Find the MLE of x given:

f(y | x) = (x + 1)y^x, 0 < y < 1 and x > -1
f(y | x) = 0 elsewhere.

I am assuming that (i) f is the pdf of "y given x" and (ii) the y's are independent.

Then, the simplest procedure would be to take the log of L(x) = \prod_{i = 1}^n (x + 1)y_i^x and maximize it with respect to x.
 
Last edited:
So I get:

ln[((x+1)^n)*(y1^x)*(y2^x)*...*(yn^x)], but I don't see how you maximize this.

I would imagine you take the derivative and set it equal to zero, but I cannot solve for x. What is the maximum value for x?

Thanks for the help from before.
 
OK, I just want to check this.

I get:
ln[((x+1)^n)*(y1^x)*(y2^x)*...*(yn^x)] =
nln(x+1) + x[ln(y1) + ln(y2) + ... + ln(yn)

I take the derivative with respect to x and set it equal to zero:
n/(x+1) + ln(y1) + ln(y2) + ... + y(n)
and with algebra this implies

x (the estimator) = [-n - ln(y1) - ln(y2) - ... - ln(yn)] / [ln(y1) + ... + ln(yn)

Does this make sense? Thanks again for your help; it is appreciated.
 
If there are an infinite number of natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and... then that must mean that there are not only infinite infinities, but an infinite number of those infinities. and an infinite number of those...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K