Modeling Sandwich Composites in Workbench: Non-Penalty Based Contact?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 14K views
BlkHwkEng
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
When I model a honeycomb type composite in workbench I tired modeling the core material as an orthogonal material type using solid tet elements and the aluminum face sheets as isotropic shell elements. I base the core material properties off of the honeycomb manufactures data for stiffness. using this approach I am able to get fairly accurate stress results when compared to hand calculations of the same simple problems (i.e. simple beam with distributed loading) but my deflections are completely wrong. I was hoping someone could give me insight on how to go about modeling sandwich composites in workbench...hopefully without paying another 50k for some type of composites modeler. Also I am getting a little better at APDL so if anyone wants to give advice based upon it I would be all ears.

Also I get tons of penetration between the face sheet and core material, should I use a non-penalty based contact or will this mess things up even more.

I hope this post makes sense...it is very late here and I am about to fall asleep on my keyboard.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Rather than using contact elements, perhaps you could try coupling them (CP)?
 


Way better results doing in like that. Thanks again minger