Modeling this differential equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on modeling the rate at which water rises in a paper towel dipped into a puddle, framed as a differential equation problem. Key factors include the initial rapid absorption of water, the eventual slowing down of this process, and the maximum height reached by the water in the towel. The proposed model incorporates gravity, towel absorption, and evaporation effects, with the independent variable as time and the dependent variable as the height of water in the towel. The equation can be expressed as \(\frac{dx}{dt} = r(x)\), where \(r(x)\) is determined by the bending of the towel and the gravitational influence.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential equations
  • Familiarity with concepts of fluid dynamics
  • Knowledge of the principle of least action
  • Basic physics of gravity and surface tension
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the derivation of differential equations in fluid dynamics
  • Research the principle of least action in physics
  • Study the effects of gravity on fluid absorption in porous materials
  • Investigate functional forms of absorption rates in differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics and mathematics, particularly those studying differential equations, fluid dynamics, and material science, will benefit from this discussion.

ramb
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi,

My differential equations professor wanted us to think about this problem:

How would you go about modeling the rate at which water raises on a paper towel dipped into a puddle with fixed water level.


I figure this would be a differential equation, but I'm not sure as to the form of this. He hinted that the solution could be, say a number raised to the variable, or the variable raised to a power.

I'm having trouble with the physics. Initially, in the in class experiment, the paper towel soaked up the water very, very fast at first (within the first couple of seconds), then slowed down dramatically, Further, we found that the soaking level does not go past a certain point in the paper towel after a long time - and that when this experiment was repeated, it stopped at the same place. We figured that it had to do with the rate at which the water was evaporating was making up for the flow rate that the water was going upwards the towel.

So the differential equation should involve both evaporation, something to do with the towel's absorption, and gravity, right? The independent variable should be time, and the dependent variable should be the height on the towel the water has gotten to.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The calculation will be simpler with the principle of least action. Consider the difference between the surface energies of water-air & water-paper . Add the gravitational potential to it & subtract the kinetic energy. Integrating over time yields the action.
 
Sounds like his hints are toward a simple functional model. I don't think evaporation is an issue in the time scale you are using.

If you are considering a function form consider the initial rate and the asymptotic behavior as t->infinity.

If you're going the physical route a la a differential equation then consider that gravity IS a factor and then consider how the paper behaves if it is bent to run horizontal at various heights above the liquid surface.

Just from measurements you should be able to map out the rates to get:
\frac{dx}{dt} = r(x)
determining r(x) from the rate for a given height of the bend.
You can then guess how it would be affected by gravity and what functional form r(x) takes. Then solve to see if it fits the function form you might have guessed earlier with its observed asymptotic form. You should be able to solve for constants using the max height.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
8K