Moment Analysis: Sign Conventions & Force Selection

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the sign conventions and force selection for moment analysis in 3-D statics. Key points include the application of the right-hand screw rule and the importance of using the cross-product to determine moment direction. The example provided demonstrates how to calculate moments using forces and distances, emphasizing the need to maintain consistent units (Newtons vs. pounds) and proper sign conventions. The correct calculation of moments is illustrated with a tension force of 400 N and a moment arm of 0.9 m, resulting in a moment of 360 N-m in the i direction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of 3-D statics principles
  • Familiarity with vector cross-products
  • Knowledge of sign conventions in mechanics
  • Ability to convert between units (e.g., pounds to Newtons)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the right-hand rule for determining moment direction
  • Learn vector cross-product calculations in detail
  • Explore the implications of sign conventions in engineering mechanics
  • Review unit conversion techniques for forces and distances
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, civil engineers, and students studying statics who need to understand moment analysis and force selection in three-dimensional systems.

aahas3
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm having trouble determining the sign conventions for the appropriate moments and which forces correspond to the appropriate moment analysis in the following question .The solutions are provided but i still need to know the fundamentals behind such selection and the sign conventions for it as the demonstrator explained how to use the right hand screw rule I am not really sure.

Egs When applying Fz = 400 how do we know the moment is positive giving 400*0.1 and the two right angle forces of 300. Their X components how do we discern whether their positive or negative when doing the moment equations.

Last how to know which forces should be used to determine the moment for the individual moment cases ies ƩMx or ƩMy. Thnks
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2013-06-17 at 5.51.58 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2013-06-17 at 5.51.58 PM.png
    19.8 KB · Views: 689
  • Screen Shot 2013-06-17 at 5.55.30 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2013-06-17 at 5.55.30 PM.png
    44.2 KB · Views: 668
Engineering news on Phys.org
Aside from the obvious defects in this problem (Forces given in lbs in the text, Forces on diagram are in Newtons; neither of which convert), for 3-D statics, assume that for forces and distances, positive magnitudes correspond to positive directions as indicated by the coordinate axes.

To derive the corresponding moment direction, one can always fall back on the definition of the cross-product for two vectors. For example, say we use a radius of 1 m (i-cap) and a force of 1 N (j-cap). What would be the direction of the resulting moment?

Setting up the cross product determinant:

Code:
| i   j   k |
| 1   0   0 |  =  (0 i  +  0 j  + 1 k) N-m
| 0   1   0 |

This is one way of determining a positive sense for a moment.

Another simpler method is to write out the unit vectors thus:

i j k | i j

This is a memory device to help one understand the cross product of the individual unit vectors.

For example, i x j = k, which we can see by looking at the first two unit vectors, i and j, and then reading the next unit vector, k. If we continue, working from left to right, we obtain the following results:

i x j = k
j x k = i
k x i = j

If we were to start at the extreme right and work back to the left, then three different results are obtained:

j x i = -k
i x k = -j
k x j = -i

In the case of the moment produced by the 400 N tension, the solution has cheated a little and not included the proper signs of the tension and the moment arm of 0.9 m. In both instances, the magnitudes should have been negative, but the solution writer got lazy and omitted them. Thus the proper calculation should have been

r = -0.9 m (j-cap)
F = -400 N (k-cap)

moment = r x F = -0.9 j x -400 k = 360 N-m i

which matches the diagram.

By using these methods to compute the moments, much worry is avoided in trying to figure out about which axis the moment will be produced.

For more about cross products see :

https://ecourses.ou.edu/cgi-bin/ebook.cgi?doc=&topic=st&chap_sec=04.3&page=theory
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
12K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K