MHB Moment-Generating Function question

  • Thread starter Thread starter JGalway
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
AI Thread Summary
The moment-generating function \( M_x(t) = \frac{t}{t-1} \) cannot correspond to any random variable because \( M_x(0) \) does not equal 1, which is a requirement for valid moment-generating functions. Differentiating the function yields a mean of 1 and a variance of 1, which initially appears acceptable. However, the failure of \( M_x(0) \) to equal 1 indicates that it does not satisfy the properties of a moment-generating function. This inconsistency confirms that no random variable can be represented by this moment-generating function. Understanding these properties is crucial for identifying valid moment-generating functions in probability theory.
JGalway
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Q:Explain why there can be no random variable for which $M_x(t)=\frac{t}{t-1}$
($M_x(t)$ is the moment-generating function of the random variable $x$.)

A: I tried differentiating it twice and got mean of $x=1$ and variance of $x=1$ which seems fine. Maybe its because $M_x(0)$ is not equal to $1$?Thanks in advance for any help with this problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JGalway said:
Maybe its because $M_x(0)$ is not equal to $1$?

Yes, that's exactly the reason.
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top