MHB Moment of Inertia: Disc+Point Mass | Help Needed

markosheehan
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
Find the moment of inertia of a disc of mass m and radius r with a point mass of m on its circumference. i can't work this out can someone help me. i can work out that the moment of inertia of the disc is 1/2mr^2 but i don't know what to do with the point mass. i think it could have to do with some thing with the parallel axes theorem. the answer at the back of the book is 11/2 ml^2
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
markosheehan said:
Find the moment of inertia of a disc of mass m and radius r with a point mass of m on its circumference. i can't work this out can someone help me. i can work out that the moment of inertia of the disc is 1/2mr^2 but i don't know what to do with the point mass. i think it could have to do with some thing with the parallel axes theorem. the answer at the back of the book is 11/2 ml^2

The moment of inertia is the sum of all mass contributions times their squared distances to the axis.
In formula:
$$I_z = \sum_i m_i r^2$$
or for a body:
$$I_z = \int r^2\,dm $$

It implies that we can sum the two contributions of moment of inertia together (with respect to the same axis).
And it also implies that a point mass $m$ rotating at distance $r$ from the axis has moment of inertia $mr^2$.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top