Moment of Inertia Formula Query

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the moment of inertia formula for an I beam, specifically addressing discrepancies between the provided formula and the standard bd^3/12 method. The formula given in the exam is an approximation derived from Steiner's theorem, which yields an I value of 7.73x10^6 mm^4 when calculated using Skyciv's online beam calculator and verified with Calcpad. While the formula is correct for thin-walled sections, it produces higher values due to the overlap of the web and flanges, making it less accurate for thicker sections.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of moment of inertia and its significance in beam analysis.
  • Familiarity with Steiner's theorem and its application in structural engineering.
  • Knowledge of I beam dimensions and properties, including web thickness and flange dimensions.
  • Experience using online beam calculators like Skyciv and spreadsheet tools like Calcpad.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of Steiner's theorem in structural analysis.
  • Learn how to accurately calculate the moment of inertia for various beam shapes.
  • Explore the limitations of approximation formulas in engineering calculations.
  • Investigate the differences between area moment of inertia and polar moment of inertia.
USEFUL FOR

Structural engineers, civil engineering students, and professionals involved in beam design and analysis will benefit from this discussion, particularly those working with I beams and moment of inertia calculations.

Iain123
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello, this formula was given to me in an exam to find the moment of inertia of an I beam,

https://ibb.co/jY7ZKG
jY7ZKG


jY7ZKG

However this formula seems to give a different answer to the standard bd^3/12 method, is the formula in the image wrong ?
Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hello Iain, :welcome:

Interesting, an exam that provides a formula without explaining what the symbols and their dimensions are and (at least, if ##I## stands for the moment of inertia) gives a formula with the wrong dimension.

I see no images. The link works:
upload_2018-1-19_22-45-7.png


What is this and what is your standard ? (not this one, I suppose)
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-1-19_22-45-7.png
    upload_2018-1-19_22-45-7.png
    37.5 KB · Views: 768
It seems to be a crude approximation of the appropriate way of doing it (see ##I_x##, from source):

area_moment_of_inertia_I_beam_example.jpg
 

Attachments

  • area_moment_of_inertia_I_beam_example.jpg
    area_moment_of_inertia_I_beam_example.jpg
    25.5 KB · Views: 1,030
BvU said:
if II stands for the moment of inertia) gives a formula with the wrong dimension.

The dimensions of this expression are L^4 which is entirely appropriate for an AREA moment of inertia, a quantity commonly used in the analysis of beams.
 
I kind of realized that. Would have helped if Iain had mentioned it in post #1 (##I## as moment of inerita is more common for ordinary physicists...:rolleyes: ).

Now: wat is your standard?
 
Thanks for your reply's,
I have attached an image showing my working using both formulas, and also a picture showing the I beam dimensions (web thickness is 20mm).

https://ibb.co/nMDCrw

Using Skyciv's online beam calculator returns an I value of 7.73x10^6 mm^4 , the same as i got on top line. Also this is only concerning the Ixx value and not Iyy , and I is referring to the second moment of area.
I don't understand how the second formula can return a different value and still be correct, i must be missing something :-/
Thanks
 
Last edited:
The answer I = 7733333 mm4 is correct. To make sure, I double checked it with Calcpad:
http://calcpad.net/Spreadsheet/208/double-tee-section

The formula in the exam is correct but it is approximate. It is obtained by taking the web and adding the flanges by the Steiner's theorem:
I = 2t*h3/12 + 2*b*t*(h/2)2
I = t*h3/6 + b*t*h2/2
I = (t*h3/6) + 3*b/h*(t*h3/6)
I = t*h3/6*(1 + 3*b/h)
The problem is that web and flanges overlap, so this formula produces higher values than the exact one.
It can be used only for thin-walled sections where 't' is much smaller than the other dimensions. Then the overlap becomes negligible.
 
  • Like
Likes jack action

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
588
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K