Moment of Inertia Formula Query

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the moment of inertia formula for an I beam, specifically comparing a formula provided in an exam to the standard method of calculating moment of inertia using the formula bd^3/12. Participants explore the implications of the formula's dimensions and its accuracy.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the validity of the formula given in the exam, noting it seems to yield different results than the standard method.
  • Another participant points out that the formula may have incorrect dimensions if it is intended to represent the moment of inertia.
  • Some participants suggest that the formula might be a crude approximation and discuss its derivation, mentioning Steiner's theorem and the overlap of web and flanges in the I beam.
  • A participant shares their calculations using both formulas and an online beam calculator, indicating a specific value for the moment of inertia and expressing confusion over the discrepancies between the formulas.
  • One participant confirms the correctness of a specific moment of inertia value while explaining that the exam formula is approximate and may yield higher values due to the overlap of components in the I beam.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity and accuracy of the exam formula, with some supporting its use under certain conditions while others challenge its dimensions and applicability. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the formula's correctness in all contexts.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about the dimensions and conditions under which the exam formula is applicable, particularly concerning the overlap of the web and flanges in the I beam.

Iain123
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello, this formula was given to me in an exam to find the moment of inertia of an I beam,

https://ibb.co/jY7ZKG
jY7ZKG


jY7ZKG

However this formula seems to give a different answer to the standard bd^3/12 method, is the formula in the image wrong ?
Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hello Iain, :welcome:

Interesting, an exam that provides a formula without explaining what the symbols and their dimensions are and (at least, if ##I## stands for the moment of inertia) gives a formula with the wrong dimension.

I see no images. The link works:
upload_2018-1-19_22-45-7.png


What is this and what is your standard ? (not this one, I suppose)
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-1-19_22-45-7.png
    upload_2018-1-19_22-45-7.png
    37.5 KB · Views: 790
It seems to be a crude approximation of the appropriate way of doing it (see ##I_x##, from source):

area_moment_of_inertia_I_beam_example.jpg
 

Attachments

  • area_moment_of_inertia_I_beam_example.jpg
    area_moment_of_inertia_I_beam_example.jpg
    25.5 KB · Views: 1,042
BvU said:
if II stands for the moment of inertia) gives a formula with the wrong dimension.

The dimensions of this expression are L^4 which is entirely appropriate for an AREA moment of inertia, a quantity commonly used in the analysis of beams.
 
I kind of realized that. Would have helped if Iain had mentioned it in post #1 (##I## as moment of inerita is more common for ordinary physicists...:rolleyes: ).

Now: wat is your standard?
 
Thanks for your reply's,
I have attached an image showing my working using both formulas, and also a picture showing the I beam dimensions (web thickness is 20mm).

https://ibb.co/nMDCrw

Using Skyciv's online beam calculator returns an I value of 7.73x10^6 mm^4 , the same as i got on top line. Also this is only concerning the Ixx value and not Iyy , and I is referring to the second moment of area.
I don't understand how the second formula can return a different value and still be correct, i must be missing something :-/
Thanks
 
Last edited:
The answer I = 7733333 mm4 is correct. To make sure, I double checked it with Calcpad:
http://calcpad.net/Spreadsheet/208/double-tee-section

The formula in the exam is correct but it is approximate. It is obtained by taking the web and adding the flanges by the Steiner's theorem:
I = 2t*h3/12 + 2*b*t*(h/2)2
I = t*h3/6 + b*t*h2/2
I = (t*h3/6) + 3*b/h*(t*h3/6)
I = t*h3/6*(1 + 3*b/h)
The problem is that web and flanges overlap, so this formula produces higher values than the exact one.
It can be used only for thin-walled sections where 't' is much smaller than the other dimensions. Then the overlap becomes negligible.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jack action

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K