Moment of inertia of a rod with balls attached

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the moment of inertia of a rod with attached point masses (balls) and how to adjust calculations when changing the axis of rotation. The subject area includes concepts from rotational dynamics and the parallel axis theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the calculation of moment of inertia for a rod and attached masses, questioning the inclusion of the rod's inertia when changing the axis of rotation. Some participants express confusion regarding the application of the parallel axis theorem and the distribution of mass.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing the correct application of the parallel axis theorem and its implications on the moment of inertia calculations. Some have provided hints and clarifications, while others are still seeking to understand the adjustments needed for their calculations.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of specific values and formulas used in calculations, as well as references to external resources for further clarification. Participants are navigating through the complexities of the problem without reaching a definitive conclusion.

AfronPie

Homework Statement


Attached.

Homework Equations


I=mr^2, I=(1/12)m*l^2 for a rod.

The Attempt at a Solution


Part A I got by doing I=(1/12)3.5*(2.6)^2+2*.7*1.3^2 (I added the moment of inertia of the rod and the balls). Part B since the axis is on one of the balls, I thought we don't include that ball in the calculations. So the rod stays, (1/12)m*l^2 and we add the other .7 kg ball which is 2.6m away. So I_total=(1/12)3.5*2.6^2+.7(2.6)^2=6.7 kg*m^2. However that isn't the right answer. Can someone please explain to me where I went wrong. Any help is greatly appreciated.
Physics Q.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
AfronPie said:
So the rod stays, (1/12)m*l^2
Think about that.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: AfronPie
TSny said:
Think about that.
Can you explain your hint. Why wouldn't you include the I of the rod?
 
You do need to include I for the rod. But when you move the axis of rotation to one end of the rod, does I for the rod remain the same?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: AfronPie
TSny said:
You do need to include I for the rod. But when you move the axis of rotation to one end of the rod, does I for the rod remain the same?
Im confused. The only reason why I knew I=1/12ml^2 is because I looked up moment of inertia for a rod. The mass is the same and the length of the rod is the same? Can you please explain what it would change to and why?
 
Moment of inertia depends on how the mass of the object is distributed around the axis of rotation. When you switch the axis, you change how the mass is distributed relative to the new axis. Consult PAT (Parallel Axis Theorem).

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/parax.html
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: AfronPie
TSny said:
Moment of inertia depends on how the mass of the object is distributed around the axis of rotation. When you switch the axis, you change how the mass is distributed relative to the new axis. Consult PAT (Parallel Axis Theorem).

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/parax.html
Alright so I'm using the theorem. So I_total(rod)=I_cm+md^2=(1/12)3.5*2.6^2+4.9(1.3)^2=10.25
10.25+.7(2.6)^2=14.98 kg*m^2. Is this right?
 
AfronPie said:
Alright so I'm using the theorem. So I_total(rod)=I_cm+md^2=(1/12)3.5*2.6^2+4.9(1.3)^2=10.25
10.25+.7(2.6)^2=14.98 kg*m^2. Is this right?
It looks OK except for the factor of 4.9. How did you get that number?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: AfronPie
TSny said:
It looks OK except for the factor of 4.9. How did you get that number?
It's the M in the parallel axis equation which I thought meant the sum of all the masses.
 
  • #10
You should apply the theorem to just the rod. You are taking care of the point masses separately.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: AfronPie
  • #11
TSny said:
You should apply the theorem to just the rod. You are taking care of the point masses separately.
I_total(rod)=I_cm+md^2=(1/12)3.5*2.6^2+3.5(1.3)^2=7.89
7.89+.7(2.6)^2=12.62 kg*m^2. I just put it in and its right, thanks a lot for your help Tsny.
 
  • #12
Great! Good work.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K