Moment of Inertia of Half Ring (Half Circle)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the moment of inertia for a pendulum-like object with a mass m suspended by a rope of length L. The moment of inertia is derived using the integral I=∫mr²dr, where the mass is treated as a point mass at distance r from the rotation axis. The parallel axis theorem is suggested as a useful tool if the assumption of point mass does not hold. The discussion highlights the importance of consistent definitions for mass when applying the integral.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of moment of inertia concepts
  • Familiarity with integral calculus
  • Knowledge of the parallel axis theorem
  • Basic principles of pendulum motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the parallel axis theorem in different scenarios
  • Explore advanced integral calculus techniques for varying mass distributions
  • Learn about the dynamics of pendulum motion and its equations of motion
  • Investigate the moment of inertia for composite shapes and their applications
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone involved in dynamics and rotational motion analysis.

Arman777
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
2,163
Reaction score
191

Homework Statement


there's an object which makes a pendulum motion.Lets suppose we hang the mass to the ceiling.We released the object with inital angle 0 to the ceiling.(I mean the angle between the object and the ceiling is zero).Whats the moment of the Inertia to the point A.

A is a point on the ceiling which middle of the motion.Lets suppose Lenght of the rope is L then.Imagine the inital position.there's mass m and it makes zero angle with object.Now A point will be (Objects position-L)=A

Mass of object m
Lenght of rope L

Homework Equations


I=∫mr^2dr

The Attempt at a Solution


M=∫mdr which r goes to -r to r
and
I=∫mr^2dr so
I=∫dM/dr r^2 dr
I=∫dMr^2
I=Mr^2

Is this correct.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. All the mass is at distance r from the rotation axis. You basically assume your object is a point mass.

If this assumption no longer holds, the parallel axis theorem is a good tool to use.
 
Your algebra is sort of correct if you define m to be the linear density of the object (as a function of distance along it) and M as the total mass. Even then, you have used M in two different ways. Inside the integral you have used it as total mass from the axis out to some distance r. Outside the integral you used it as the mass of the complete object.
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
14K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K