Momentum Conservation: A Ball Strikes a Wall

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the conservation of momentum, specifically focusing on a scenario where a ball strikes a wall and bounces off. Participants are exploring the implications of momentum change and the conditions under which it occurs.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Exploratory

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to determine the change in momentum of the ball after it strikes the wall, with some suggesting that the change is 2p based on their reasoning about direction and velocity. Others are questioning the assumptions regarding the nature of the collision, such as whether it is elastic and how it affects momentum.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and questioning the assumptions made in the original problem. There is an exploration of different interpretations regarding the momentum after the bounce and the conditions that affect it. Guidance has been offered regarding the implications of mass differences between the ball and the wall.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem lacks specific details about the nature of the collision (elastic vs. inelastic) and the direction of the ball's motion after impact. There is also mention of a related question about automobile safety features and the Impulse Principle, indicating a broader context of inquiry.

UNknown 2010
Messages
77
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A ball whose momentum is p strikes a wall and bounces off, The change in the balls momentum is:
A- 0
B- P
C- 2p
D- p/2
E-Infinity

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


It's simple question but I want to make sure if my answer is true.

The change in momentum = 0

According the momentum conservation principle.

Right ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem is asking for the change in momentum of the ball, not the ball+wall system.

Remember that momentum is a vector quantity--if the momentum is p before bouncing, what is the momentum when the ball bounces?

You are missing a bit of information here in your description--is the ball bouncing back the direction it came from, or is it being bounced at an angle?
 
Last edited:
That's not mentioned in the problem, but I thing it bounced in the same direction it came from.

momentum after bouncing would be -p

so change in momentum is p - (-p) = p + p = 2p is the answer then.

BUT how did we know the the momentum after bouncing is equal to momentum after bouncing since there could be change in the velocity, and velocity affect on the magnitude of the momentum because momentum = mass × velocity
 
UNknown 2010 said:
BUT how did we know the the momentum after bouncing is equal to momentum after bouncing since there could be change in the velocity, and velocity affect on the magnitude of the momentum because momentum = mass × velocity

You can't know, unless you specify the constraint that the bounce is completely elastic and hence total mechanical energy is also conserved.
 
Thanks for your replies.

This problem is from past exam paper, it asked to choose the most suitable answer.

The most suitable answer is 2p isn't ??

___________

Another problem:

Which of the following automobile safety features uses the Impulse Principle to reduce injury during Road Traffic Accidents?

a. Lap-shoulder seat belt.
b. Active head rest.
c. Collapsible steering column.
d. All of the above.
e. None of the above.

?!

I get confusion !
 
Last edited:
UNknown 2010 said:
BUT how did we know the the momentum after bouncing is equal to momentum after bouncing since there could be change in the velocity, and velocity affect on the magnitude of the momentum because momentum = mass × velocity
We assume the wall to have a significantly larger mass compared to the ball, such that the wall essentially remains stationary, and thus the ball rebounds with the same speed in the opposite direction. (Try to prove it using COLM when M>>m and assuming elastic collision)

As for your next problem, firstly, what do you understand about the "Impulse Principle"?
 
Fightfish said:
We assume the wall to have a significantly larger mass compared to the ball, such that the wall essentially remains stationary, and thus the ball rebounds with the same speed in the opposite direction. (Try to prove it using COLM when M>>m and assuming elastic collision)

As for your next problem, firstly, what do you understand about the "Impulse Principle"?

OK Thanks,

Impulse = Force × Time taken

If we increase the time we will decrease the force applied on the body so that we will reduce injuries.
a. Lap-shoulder seat belt. >> It use impulse principle by increasing time collision
b. Active head rest. >> It use inertia priciple
c. Collapsible steering column. >> It use impulse principle by increasing time collision
d. All of the above. >> False because B is not correct
e. None of the above. >> FalseSo ?

________

Another problem:

In gunshot injuries, which of the following is correct?

a. Shock-wave damage can temporarily compress tissue up to a maximum of 10 atm.
b. The shock-wave is transmitted mostly along skeletal bone.
c. Only those tissues in direct contact with the bullet will be damaged.
d. Enclosed liquids within the body are particularly sensitive to cavitation damage.
e. None of the above.The answer is d isn't it ?

P.S: sorry, I posed a lot of question because tomorrow I've quiz
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K